From: HardWorkingDog on
In article <harvey-3A05AB.16301019112009(a)individual.net>,
HardWorkingDog <harvey(a)mush.man> wrote:

> Matter of fact, the Dunlop MX51 tread is almost a carbon
> copy of the Michelin S2 that I'm replacing...

[edit S12 /edit]

--
Charles
'99 YZ250
From: I am Tosk on
In article <harvey-3A05AB.16301019112009(a)individual.net>,
harvey(a)mush.man says...
>
> In article <MPG.256f9ef6ae167f14989732(a)eternal-september.org>,
> I am Tosk <justwaitafrekinminute(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <ee27a28f-2757-4372-acee-
> > ea06d65939af(a)g1g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>, jwc(a)sysmatrix.net says...
> > >
> > > > I never liked the 756 that much because the edges wore off so quickly,
> > > > but I've come to realize that the tire still works pretty well as it
> > > > wears (thanks to Baxter's prodding). I thought I'd give it another
> > > > chance on this tire change.
> > >
> > > I always hated that tire. My impression was that it gave decent
> > > drive, but sucked side-to-side and couldn't hold laterally, at least
> > > in New England goo. Those characteristics in the back makes for a
> > > wagging rear end, which is no big deal, but makes for a really bad
> > > time in the front.
> > >
> > > I still like the 739s the best.
> > >
> > > JayC
> >
> > Yeah, that's why we ran the 43 in the front... Anyway, I asked the Cycle
> > Gear guy about them today he said the new replacement is the same tread
> > pattern, exactly, just a softer compound. Of course that really sucks to
> > ride in the hard clay we ride in, I suppose they will break down
> > quicker. Sir Tony likes Bridgestones at Rocky and it is his track...
> >
>
> If the Cycle Gear guy was trying to say the MX51 is the same tread
> pattern as the 756, he's doing a typical Cycle Gear guy job of
> spreading bullshit.
>
> I have in my garage a 756 and an MX51 and they are significantly
> different. Matter of fact, the Dunlop MX51 tread is almost a carbon
> copy of the Michelin S2 that I'm replacing...

Hummmm, I will give him the honest mistake on this one.. He gives me a
great deal on everything, as much a 75% off on some stuff, and my girls
get free stuff every-time we walk in the door. We have known him for
while, I don't think he would screw me intentionally, probably just read
it somewhere and has not seen the new tire....

Hope so anyway.

Rowdy Mouse Racing, need new treads already.
From: sturd on
HardWorkingDog volunteers:

> I'll be the rmd guinea pig; just picked one up from Mach 1.

The Dunlop web site still lists 752s. So I don't know what
that means.
http://www.dunlopmotorcycle.com/tirecatalog_tire.asp?id=12

I like 756 back here in the goo better.


Go fast. Take chances.
Mike S.
From: scrape on
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:29:51 -0500, I am Tosk
<justwaitafrekinminute(a)gmail.com> wrote:


>Yeah, that's why we ran the 43 in the front... Anyway, I asked the Cycle
>Gear guy about them today he said the new replacement is the same tread
>pattern, exactly, just a softer compound. Of course that really sucks to
>ride in the hard clay we ride in, I suppose they will break down
>quicker. Sir Tony likes Bridgestones at Rocky and it is his track...

All other things being equal, a softer compound is better for a
harder surface.
From: Wudsracer on
I still see the "756 combo" on sale at RockyMountainATV and, I
think, somewhere else for $99. I bought a set last month (with a
couple of other items, to get the "over $100 free freight" deal.

I figured that, since I had put in an order with Santa Deb for a
KnobbyKnife, I could get more life out of them than any 756 that I had
tried before. http://www.knobbyknife.com/order.html
I have big plans of great tire savings with that new tool. We'll see
how it goes.

Please, Charles, let me know what you think of the new MX51.

Jim

*****************************************************************************

>On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:08:38 -0500, "KW" <keith_warrennospam(a)windstream.net> wrote:

>
>"HardWorkingDog" <harvey(a)mush.man> wrote in message
>news:harvey-FEAEB6.14132219112009(a)individual.net...
>> In article <rifbg5lqe2qdsv5lhdpau10j8f6lcc31fv(a)4ax.com>,
>> Mike Baxter <mgb***@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:15:55 -0800, HardWorkingDog <harvey(a)mush.man>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >I was ready to get a new D756, and found out they're not making them
>>> >anymore--at least that's what 2 dealers told me today. Dunlop still
>>> >has it listed on their website, but no local stock. Looks like the
>>> >online places still have backstock...
>>> >
>>> >Anyway, I'm thinking of going with the replacement, now called MX51.
>>> >Curious if anyone's used it yet.
>
>I'm running a 756 rear on the KDX now and it has been a great tire, Don't
>have any personal experience with the MX51 yet, but this was posted on
>Georgia offroad from a similar query earlier today.....
>
>[quote="Slo Mo"]I think Paul is right, different tires will suit different
>riding styles. While many really like the new Dunlop MX51, I didnt really
>care for it and it was completely worn out after 13 hours of riding
>primarily prepped MX tracks. I just put on a set of 756's due to the cheap
>sale price and the initial ride was awesome, but I can tell they will not
>last long at all.
>
>My all time favorite may be the Michelin MS3. You would be surprised how
>long the MS3 will wear despite being a medium-soft tire. The old Pirelli
>MT32 on the rear and MT83 on the front was also a great set-up.[/quote]
>
>KW
>
>
>>>
>>> Is it dual compound rubber???
>>>
>>> Mike Baxter
>>
>> the waffle or the tire?
>>
>> I don't think so:
>> http://www.dunlopmotorcycle.com/tirecatalog_tire.asp?id=105
>>
>> I'll be the rmd guinea pig; just picked one up from Mach 1.
>>
>> --
>> Charles
>> '99 YZ250
>
***************************************************************
Wudsracer/Jim Cook
Smackover Racing
'06 Gas Gas DE300
'82 Husqvarna XC250
Team LAGNAF

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Prev: Happy Birthday TimH
Next: Evolv tools?