From: George W Frost on

"theo" <theodoreb(a)bigpond.com.au> wrote in message
news:f9c68348-b0ab-4393-9713-bc2709e419d6(a)r24g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 24, 1:18 pm, "George W Frost" <georgewfr...(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> Now Kev, you are not trying to say that all drivers can reverse park are
> you?
>
> Training people to reverse park, doesn't automatically make them into a
> great reverase parker.
> Yet, they still seem to get their piece of paper
> I would make a guesstimation that only 15% of drivers can revers park
> properly

Some people can only spell reverse right two times out of four.

Theo

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



Aren't I lucky to be in that category ?



From: George W Frost on

"Kevin Gleeson" <kevingleeson(a)imagine-it.com.au> wrote in message
news:kboog55fr14oq0gu6rgnp9p9r8sdcqkun1(a)4ax.com...
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:00:56 +1100, "Nev.." <idiot(a)mindless.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Zebee Johnstone wrote:
>>
>>> But... most people just want to pass the exam. ASk any teacher.
>>
>>It's not just the students who want to pass the tests. The instructors
>>want them to pass too, so that they can boast about their training
>>record to prospective students. There are driving schools in Melbourne
>>who guarantee that you will pass at the first attempt. Mind you, with
>>the new minimum 120hrs practice before you take your licence test,
>>anyone who fails at the first attempt obviously has no aptitude for the
>>task and should be banned from driving for life. When I was learing my
>>instructor thought I was ready after about 6.5 hrs total driving
>>experience. I'd have turned 30 before I could afford to pay for 120 hrs
>>instruction.
>
> 120 hours instruction? Or 120 hours logbooked?
>
> Christ, I had my pilots licence with less than 120 hours.

Some of these new drivers who have had 120 hours tuition think they are
pilots in a war zone


From: Kevin Gleeson on
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:09:25 GMT, "George W Frost"
<georgewfrost(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>
>"Kevin Gleeson" <kevingleeson(a)imagine-it.com.au> wrote in message
>news:nasog55dh7mmnu1i2efv4m9ks5rv9bv2sr(a)4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:48:27 -0800 (PST), theo
>> <theodoreb(a)bigpond.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>>On Nov 24, 1:03 pm, "George W Frost" <georgewfr...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> "theo" <theodo...(a)bigpond.com.au> wrote in message
>>>
>>>> In WA as I believe in QLD, you must have an accompanying 'instructor'
>>>> when on L plates. The law says that that person may be riding another
>>>> motor cycle or be a pillion on the learners bike. I don't think I've
>>>> ever seen the second option exercised.
>>>>
>>>> Theo
>>>>
>>>> ********************************
>>>>
>>>> Just trying to visualize a 15year old riding a moped with his mother on
>>>> the
>>>> back
>>>
>>>At 15, he is already taller and heavier than his mother.
>>
>> My god-daughter at age 7 could sit on my Blackbird, hold the
>> handlebars and put both feet firmly on the pegs. She must be 12-13 now
>> (haven't seen her for a couple of years). God knows how tall she'd be
>> now. 4-5 years time her dad is going to be sitting on the front
>> verandah with a shotgun though . . .
>
>
>
>You have got high hopes if you think it will be 4 - 5 years time

Yeah, guess so . . .
From: atec7 7 "atec on
Kevin Gleeson wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:09:25 GMT, "George W Frost"

>>>>> the
>>>>> back
>>>> At 15, he is already taller and heavier than his mother.
>>> My god-daughter at age 7 could sit on my Blackbird, hold the
>>> handlebars and put both feet firmly on the pegs. She must be 12-13 now
>>> (haven't seen her for a couple of years). God knows how tall she'd be
>>> now. 4-5 years time her dad is going to be sitting on the front
>>> verandah with a shotgun though . . .
>>
>>
>> You have got high hopes if you think it will be 4 - 5 years time
>
> Yeah, guess so . . .
After being locked in her bedroom for 9 years we released the daughter
to a church social at 21 ( not :)
I found early on answering the door with a scowl and a loud "WHAT"
worked wonders
From: Fraser Johnston on

"theo" <theodoreb(a)bigpond.com.au> wrote in message
news:7e37ae76-119f-4a7d-ba7f-f5aae5a3ce0f(a)g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 23, 5:14 pm, Lars Chance <lars.cha...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> theo wrote:
> > In WA moped officially means
>
> > Moped
> > A motorcycle that has a propelling engine having a piston
> > displacement not exceeding 50 cc and which is designed so as to be
> > capable of a speed not exceeding 60 kilometres per hour.
>
> > Licence Class R-N Minimum age 16. My 15 yo grandson has a learners
> > permit for this class at the moment. He will be able to get his
> > licence next May when he turns 16. Meanwhile he can ride around on L's
> > as long as his mum or dad are with him.
>
> 60?!!?
> Most of the states limit it to a less workable 50.

The above definition was cut and pasted from the Dept of Transport
website. However, intro models like the V-Moto Milan can't do 60.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

My girlfriends Milan has been clocked at 70kph with 100kg of me on it. That
was on a flat road too. It may of been derestricted by a previous owner
however.

Fraser


First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Prev: Yamaha design flaw
Next: Got some spare coin?