From: theo on
On Nov 25, 11:24 am, "Fraser Johnston" <ftr...(a)iinet.net.au> wrote:
> "theo" <theodo...(a)bigpond.com.au> wrote in message

> The above definition was cut and pasted from the Dept of Transport
> website. However, intro models like the V-Moto Milan can't do 60.
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> My girlfriends Milan has been clocked at 70kph with 100kg of me on it.  That
> was on a flat road too.  It may of been derestricted by a previous owner
> however.

Then it probably is no longer the intro model. We had two Milans at
work (mostly because we did their website) and they would do 55 with a
light person, 65 with a heavy person, downhill with a tailwind. They
were the initial model, current WA sold models may have been changed
to keep up with the WA laws.

Theo
From: Fraser Johnston on

"theo" <theodoreb(a)bigpond.com.au> wrote in message
news:d768eeaa-9cf2-4ed0-8a58-164bb74a3531(a)u1g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 25, 11:24 am, "Fraser Johnston" <ftr...(a)iinet.net.au> wrote:
> "theo" <theodo...(a)bigpond.com.au> wrote in message

> The above definition was cut and pasted from the Dept of Transport
> website. However, intro models like the V-Moto Milan can't do 60.
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> My girlfriends Milan has been clocked at 70kph with 100kg of me on it. That
> was on a flat road too. It may of been derestricted by a previous owner
> however.

Then it probably is no longer the intro model. We had two Milans at
work (mostly because we did their website) and they would do 55 with a
light person, 65 with a heavy person, downhill with a tailwind. They
were the initial model, current WA sold models may have been changed
to keep up with the WA laws.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Could be. I think it is a 2006. I know it went in for a rebuild under
warranty which the previous owner said made it a lot faster.

Fraser


From: Knobdoodle on


"theo" <theodoreb(a)bigpond.com.au> wrote:
I'm getting this visual picture of gNat learning to ride a 250 with
you sitting on the back. Does the front wheel maintain contact with
the road? :-)

----------
It was a CB125 actually and it certainly wasn't the power making it
wheelstand!
http://www.xoopit.com/s/20xrh1z59q6lunt5bsk7
(gNat's abut the only remaining item in that pic. Both dogs and both bikes
are gone, as is the fridge-trailer!
Even Michelle has traded in her old conveyance [at the rear near the
hose-reel] and drives a car now instead!)
--
Clem
(http://xkcd.com/621/)


From: Nev.. on
Knobdoodle wrote:
> "theo" <theodoreb(a)bigpond.com.au> wrote:
> I'm getting this visual picture of gNat learning to ride a 250 with
> you sitting on the back. Does the front wheel maintain contact with
> the road? :-)
>
> ----------
> It was a CB125 actually and it certainly wasn't the power making it
> wheelstand!
> http://www.xoopit.com/s/20xrh1z59q6lunt5bsk7
> (gNat's abut the only remaining item in that pic. Both dogs and both bikes
> are gone, as is the fridge-trailer!
> Even Michelle has traded in her old conveyance [at the rear near the
> hose-reel] and drives a car now instead!)

What about the wheel barrow? were you sitting in it?

Nev..
'08 DL1000K8
From: Knobdoodle on
"Nev.." <idiot(a)mindless.com> wrote:
>> http://www.xoopit.com/s/20xrh1z59q6lunt5bsk7
> What about the wheel barrow? were you sitting in it?
>
Well... a man's gotta' get around the house SOMEHOW!!
--
Clem


First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Prev: Yamaha design flaw
Next: Got some spare coin?