more bike bashing ?
in [Aussie Motorcycles]
|
Prev: Yamaha design flaw
Next: Got some spare coin?
From: alx on 30 Nov 2009 15:20 On Dec 1, 1:34 am, atec7 7 <"atec 77"@hotmail.com> wrote: > alx wrote: > > On Nov 27, 9:11 am, Kevin Gleeson <kevinglee...(a)imagine-it.com.au> > > wrote: > > >> Read my answers. > >> I do believe everyone should be licenced. > > > I only believe that competent people should be licenced. > > Now that's a can of worms in it's self by the methodology involved in > determination > How would you handle it ? For a start, accepting the concept that not everyone should be licenced.
From: hippo on 30 Nov 2009 17:48 alx wrote: > > On Dec 1, 1:34�am, atec7 7 <"atec 77"@hotmail.com> wrote: > > alx wrote: > > > On Nov 27, 9:11 am, Kevin Gleeson <kevinglee...(a)imagine-it.com.au> > > > wrote: > > > > >> Read my answers. > > >> I do believe everyone should be licenced. > > > > > I only believe that competent people should be licenced. > > > > Now that's a can of worms in it's self by the methodology involved in > > determination > > � How would you handle it ? > > For a start, accepting the concept that not everyone should be > licenced. > > So, what's for the rest? Sectioned? -- Posted at www.usenet.com.au
From: atec7 7 "atec on 30 Nov 2009 18:46 alx wrote: > On Dec 1, 1:34 am, atec7 7 <"atec 77"@hotmail.com> wrote: >> alx wrote: >>> On Nov 27, 9:11 am, Kevin Gleeson <kevinglee...(a)imagine-it.com.au> >>> wrote: >>>> Read my answers. >>>> I do believe everyone should be licenced. >>> I only believe that competent people should be licenced. >> Now that's a can of worms in it's self by the methodology involved in >> determination >> How would you handle it ? > > For a start, accepting the concept that not everyone should be > licenced. SO in fact you can't provide a suitable solution and grasp at piecemeal straws
From: alx on 30 Nov 2009 21:04 On Dec 1, 10:46 am, atec7 7 <"atec 77"@hotmail.com> wrote: > alx wrote: > > On Dec 1, 1:34 am, atec7 7 <"atec 77"@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> alx wrote: > >>> On Nov 27, 9:11 am, Kevin Gleeson <kevinglee...(a)imagine-it.com.au> > >>> wrote: > >>>> Read my answers. > >>>> I do believe everyone should be licenced. > >>> I only believe that competent people should be licenced. > >> Now that's a can of worms in it's self by the methodology involved in > >> determination > >> How would you handle it ? > > > For a start, accepting the concept that not everyone should be > > licenced. > > SO in fact you can't provide a suitable solution and grasp at piecemeal > straws What are you on about? EVERYONE is capable of using the roads safely? A car driver is capable of also driving a semi-trailer? A 17 year old is capable of driving a passenger bus?
From: alx on 30 Nov 2009 21:05
On Dec 1, 9:48 am, am9obmhAc2hvYWwubmV0LmF1(a)REGISTERED_USER_usenet.com.au (hippo) wrote: > alx wrote: > > > On Dec 1, 1:34 am, atec7 7 <"atec 77"@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > alx wrote: > > > > On Nov 27, 9:11 am, Kevin Gleeson <kevinglee...(a)imagine-it.com.au> > > > > wrote: > > > > >> Read my answers. > > > >> I do believe everyone should be licenced. > > > > > I only believe that competent people should be licenced. > > > > Now that's a can of worms in it's self by the methodology involved in > > > determination > > > How would you handle it ? > > > For a start, accepting the concept that not everyone should be > > licenced. > > So, what's for the rest? Sectioned? > > -- > Posted atwww.usenet.com.au Don't need a licence to catch a bus, train or walk. |