speed wobbles
in [Motorcycles]
|
From: 府寺 on 6 Feb 2010 19:11 On Feb 6, 4:06 pm, "55 going on 15 Don" <d.lan...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Now that's fixed too. Just what reeky needs: a bunch of middle aged dudes behaving like junior high school students.
From: S'mee on 6 Feb 2010 23:11 On Feb 6, 5:11 pm, åºå¯º <breoganmacbr...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Feb 6, 4:06 pm, "55 going on 15 Don" <d.lan...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Now that's fixed too. > > Just what reeky needs: a bunch of middle aged dudes behaving like > mature adults who don't tolerate people like Krusty. There fixed that for you...say is it true your indian name is "Toppedahorse"?
From: The Older Gentleman on 7 Feb 2010 03:11 ?? <breoganmacbrath(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > I wasn't talking about how *old* my FZR is, I was saying that the > FZR1000 was the Cadillac standard of sportbikes from 1989 until the > introduction of the lighter, more agile 900RR. No, you weren't. Because you said it was the standard by which every sports bike was judged even after the intro of the Blade. That's what you posted. > > I never said that. I said that it was the Cadillac standard against > which all other sportbikes were judged. But you're still basing your 'bike wobble' thesis on it. You also said other bikes folllowed its beam frame, which is nonsense, because Yamaha didn't pioneer those. >There was an FZR1000 in every > Motorcyclist comparo for years and years. Yes, absolutely. It was a good bike. In. Its. Time. And your point was that it wobbled, so all bikes wobble. This is nonsense. You're still spouting shite. -- BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F Triumph Street Triple Suzuki TS250ER GN250 Damn, back to six bikes! Try Googling before asking a damn silly question. chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
From: 府寺 on 7 Feb 2010 07:38 On Feb 7, 12:11 am, totallydeadmail...(a)yahoo.co.uk (Suffering from Mercury Poisoning?) wrote: > > Yes, absolutely. It was a good bike. In. Its. Time. And your point was > that it wobbled, so all bikes wobble. This is nonsense. There is something broken in your brain, isn't there? ALL motorcycles WILL wobble or speed weave if the front/rear traction balance is disrupted. With 27~28 degrees of rake, the FZR1000 was an icon of steering stability, but it wasn't agile because of that stability. It could run away from all its competitors because it had a lot for power for the day, but it wasn't maneuverable in the tight twisties. And even the FZR1000 can wobble or weave on bad or low traction pavement or if the tires are old.
From: The Older Gentleman on 7 Feb 2010 10:10
?? <breoganmacbrath(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > Yes, absolutely. It was a good bike. In. Its. Time. And your point was > > that it wobbled, so all bikes wobble. This is nonsense. > > There is something broken in your brain, isn't there? Not mine, yours. > > ALL motorcycles WILL wobble or speed weave if the front/rear traction > balance is disrupted. Of course they will, but you have repeatedly said that *all* motorcycles wobble at 120mph, and this is complete horseshit. You used your FZR as 'proof' of this. I must say the one I rode behaved, but still, yoiu're talking about a 20 year-old bike. So it's still horseshit. You said it was "the standard", even way into the Fireblade era. And that was horseshit as well. Been mucking out stables, have you? Because you've got a ton of the stuff to spread around. -- BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F Triumph Street Triple Suzuki TS250ER GN250 Damn, back to six bikes! Try Googling before asking a damn silly question. chateau dot murray at idnet dot com |