From: munchausen on 29 Sep 2007 19:41 Zebee Johnstone wrote: > In aus.motorcycles on Sun, 30 Sep 2007 08:20:51 +1000 > munchausen <baron_munchausen(a)internode.on.net> wrote: >> Jordan wrote: >>> munchausen wrote: >>>> Thankx, but a closed inspection of the bike revealed heaps more >>>> needing attention :-( >>> Just curious - is the bike a Suzuki? >> No a honda of 84 vintage. > > OK, so it is now definitely an old bike, and is inching into "as > found" status. > > Meaning there will be a bunch of little stuff needing doing. If you > are lucky the bike will be pretty well original and only easily > available bits will be missing or damaged. Faded clocks are nothing, > although if one is faded and one isn't then that's very definitely > crash damage. > > You either buy it as a cheap hack so cosmetics and lack of originality > don't matter, or you buy it as a future "look at my classic" bike and > so want as much originality as possible, followed by good major > mechanicals unless there's a solid aftermarket. Then you trawl the > wreckers looking for as many spares as you can find, especially > cosmetics. > > Then in 10 years it is definitely a "classic", and people start to > admire it, 10 years after that they are envious. > > Pick the bike of course, a bike that was admired in its time or else > has become a cult later. An early 80s SR250 is the BSA Starfire of > its day.... But then who'd have thought people would be paying good > money for Bantams? > > Zebee > Yes indeed. Bikes that were avoided like the plague when new are now changing hands at prices that bring tears to my eyes :-(. Still have the MZ though :-) M. |