1970 Nurburgring crashes
in [UK Motorcycles]
|
From: ogden on 16 Apr 2010 08:49 Champ wrote: > On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:36:29 +0100, Wicked Uncle Nigel > <wun(a)wicked-uncle-nigel.me.uk> wrote: > > >Oddly, my new (Bell) car insurance policy is the first one I've ever > >seen to explicitly exclude the Nurburgring. > > >Not that I'm likely to be toting a Rav4-wivva-slushbox around there at > >speed, but... > > What vehicle *would* you tote round at speed? My new policy for the shopping trolley (Admiral, same parent company as Bell) also excludes the Nurburgring. Not that I'm planning to be in the area, but if I was... -- ogden | gsxr1000 | rgv250
From: darsy on 16 Apr 2010 08:58 On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:44:22 +0100, Champ <news(a)champ.org.uk> wrote: >On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:36:29 +0100, Wicked Uncle Nigel ><wun(a)wicked-uncle-nigel.me.uk> wrote: > >>Oddly, my new (Bell) car insurance policy is the first one I've ever >>seen to explicitly exclude the Nurburgring. > >>Not that I'm likely to be toting a Rav4-wivva-slushbox around there at >>speed, but... > >What vehicle *would* you tote round at speed? I'm guessing something with a stuck-on throttle. -- d.
From: Wicked Uncle Nigel on 16 Apr 2010 09:35 Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, Champ <news(a)champ.org.uk> typed >On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:36:29 +0100, Wicked Uncle Nigel ><wun(a)wicked-uncle-nigel.me.uk> wrote: > >>Oddly, my new (Bell) car insurance policy is the first one I've ever >>seen to explicitly exclude the Nurburgring. > >>Not that I'm likely to be toting a Rav4-wivva-slushbox around there at >>speed, but... > >What vehicle *would* you tote round at speed? A valid point, succinctly made. -- Wicked Uncle Nigel - "He's hopeless, but he's honest" I've always been a man who's open to persuasion
From: Hog on 16 Apr 2010 10:42 Wicked Uncle Nigel <wun(a)wicked-uncle-nigel.me.uk> wrote: > Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, Champ > <news(a)champ.org.uk> typed >> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:36:29 +0100, Wicked Uncle Nigel >> <wun(a)wicked-uncle-nigel.me.uk> wrote: >> >>> Oddly, my new (Bell) car insurance policy is the first one I've ever >>> seen to explicitly exclude the Nurburgring. >> >>> Not that I'm likely to be toting a Rav4-wivva-slushbox around there >>> at speed, but... >> >> What vehicle *would* you tote round at speed? > > A valid point, succinctly made. You still own a fine British steed which as we all know will achive 140 on a dry day -- Hog
From: Ace on 16 Apr 2010 11:02
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:42:25 +0100, "Hog" <sm911SPAM(a)CHIPShotmail.co.uk> wrote: >Wicked Uncle Nigel <wun(a)wicked-uncle-nigel.me.uk> wrote: >> Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, Champ >> <news(a)champ.org.uk> typed >>> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:36:29 +0100, Wicked Uncle Nigel >>> <wun(a)wicked-uncle-nigel.me.uk> wrote: >>> >>>> Oddly, my new (Bell) car insurance policy is the first one I've ever >>>> seen to explicitly exclude the Nurburgring. >>> >>>> Not that I'm likely to be toting a Rav4-wivva-slushbox around there >>>> at speed, but... >>> >>> What vehicle *would* you tote round at speed? >> >> A valid point, succinctly made. > >You still own a fine British steed which as we all know will achive 140 on a >dry day Only if it's been well screwed together. |