2 kids, 1 pup
in [UK Motorcycles]
|
From: Champ on 14 Apr 2010 07:28 On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:33:20 +0100, YTC#1 <bdp-spambin(a)ytc1.co.uk> wrote: >> As I said previously - I hate dogs > >But I hate kids .... Even (especially?) your own? -- Champ We declare that the splendour of the world has been enriched by a new beauty: the beauty of speed. ZX10R | Hayabusa | GPz750turbo neal at champ dot org dot uk
From: Mark Olson on 14 Apr 2010 08:02 RichardA wrote: > On 14/04/2010 10:49, ginge wrote: >> Does anyone else thing this is just a bit too wrong? >> >> http://www.thisisderbyshire.co.uk/news/Shock-poster-campaign-bid-deter-dirty-dog-owners/article-2012233-detail/article.html >> > > No. Unfortunately there will always be dog owners who don't give a damn > about anyone else and this notice won't bother them. > > Viz had a character called The Parkie, a park keeper whose solution to > dogs fouling the park was to blast them with a shotgun - now that might > work :-) The owners, not the dogs, I presume. The dog is innocent.
From: Ace on 14 Apr 2010 08:11 On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:05:39 +0200, "GeoffC" <me(a)home.invalid.com> wrote: >ginge wrote: >> Does anyone else thing this is just a bit too wrong? >> >> http://www.thisisderbyshire.co.uk/news/Shock-poster-campaign-bid-deter-dirty-dog-owners/article-2012233-detail/article.html > >Would be if it was real poo, don't worry though they use "reshaped" mars >bars. Like www.veronica-moser.com ?
From: Switters on 14 Apr 2010 08:17 On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:40:23 GMT, Hog wrote: > YTC#1 <bdp-spambin(a)ytc1.co.uk> wrote: >> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:09:31 +0100, Champ wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:49:06 +0100, ginge >>> <the.gingeREMOVE(a)THISgmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Does anyone else thing this is just a bit too wrong? >>>> >>>> http://www.thisisderbyshire.co.uk/news/Shock-poster-campaign-bid-det >>>> er-dirty-dog-owners/article-2012233-detail/article.html >>> >>> As I said previously - I hate dogs >> >> But I hate kids .... sooooo > > Perhaps we should licence people to have those too? That's the first agreeable thing you've said on here in ages.
From: Ace on 14 Apr 2010 08:19
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:02:43 -0500, Mark Olson <olsonm(a)tiny.invalid> wrote: >RichardA wrote: >> On 14/04/2010 10:49, ginge wrote: >>> Does anyone else thing this is just a bit too wrong? >>> >>> http://www.thisisderbyshire.co.uk/news/Shock-poster-campaign-bid-deter-dirty-dog-owners/article-2012233-detail/article.html >>> >> >> No. Unfortunately there will always be dog owners who don't give a damn >> about anyone else and this notice won't bother them. >> >> Viz had a character called The Parkie, a park keeper whose solution to >> dogs fouling the park was to blast them with a shotgun - now that might >> work :-) > >The owners, not the dogs, I presume. The dog is innocent. Does it matter which? Either way removes the problem, although I guess someone has to sweep up the bodies instead... |