From: Owen on
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:18:15 +0000 (UTC), wessie
<putmynamehere(a)tesco.net> wrote:

>Catman <catman(a)rustcuore-sportivo.co.uk> wrote in news:i2n40m$65n$2
>@news.eternal-september.org:
>
>> J�r�my wrote:
>
>>> The only numbers I used were one and three. Didn't you do those at
>>> school?
>>>
>>
>> AIUI he's stuck on 13.
>>
>
>seems quite common

Oh come on, he's not that common...


--
Owen
From: Catman on
wessie wrote:
> Catman <catman(a)rustcuore-sportivo.co.uk> wrote in news:i2n40m$65n$2
> @news.eternal-september.org:
>
>> J�r�my wrote:
>
>>> The only numbers I used were one and three. Didn't you do those at
>>> school?
>>>
>> AIUI he's stuck on 13.
>>
>
> seems quite common
>

Yers, it does.

--
Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3
Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply)
116 Giulietta 3.0l Sprint 1.7 GTV TS GT 3.2 V6
Triumph Sprint ST 1050: It's blue, see.
www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk
From: Pip Luscher on
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:31:13 GMT, "J�r�my" <a(a)b.com> wrote:

>Catman <catman(a)rustcuore-sportivo.co.uk> wrote in news:i2mcbf$o8n$2
>@news.eternal-september.org:
>
>> Either are acceptable. There may be a small prize for someone that can
>> detail the conversion process.
>
>Obviously, from the units, 1 whale = (sqrt(1 Wales).x)^3
>
>(where x is quite small)

That's rather more cerebral than my solution, which was a conversion
process involving Welshmen eating whalemeat.

--
-Pip
From: jgh on
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:37:49 +0000, Jérémy wrote:
> Unless a whale is a weight, of course.

It is well known that a whale is a weight,
because...




....





.....


.......




you have to go to a whale-weigh station to weigh a whale.

- Stick