Gyroscopic effects
in [Motorcycles]
|
From: Henry on 12 Jul 2010 11:21 S'mee wrote: > Let me make this simple As if you could ever make it any other way, ya barely literate, helpless, hysterical, emotional, ignorant, confused, and deluded sheep... <chuckle> -- "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: S'mee on 12 Jul 2010 11:24 On Jul 12, 9:19 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > tomor...(a)erols.com wrote: > > On Jul 9, 3:15 pm, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > >> tomor...(a)erols.com wrote: > >>> On Jul 9, 10:36 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > >>>> tomor...(a)erols.com wrote: > >>>>> Yes, but it is vintage, classic, succinct, and comfortingly familiar > >>>>> reeky traditional bullshit! > >>>> Unlike your and twitbull's claim > >> Oh wow, you're so embarrassed by what you've said that you > >> had to censor it. Here's what you and twitbull believe. And > >> yes, it's very, very wrong. > >> "Left to it's [sic] own devices, a non-sidecar bike will fall > >> right over. And this is equally true whether said bike is moving > >> or at rest." That right there is some brand new reeky bullshit! <g> > >>> I'd much rather be lumped in with Pete and his positions - even when > >>> doing so is as nonsensical as you doing so above > >> The nonsense is yours and twit's, Tim. Like everyone but you > >> and twitbull, I understand that a moving bike will most definitely > >> not fall right over just as quickly as a stationary bike. Since > >> you believe that, you must also believe that all the people who've > >> seen riderless bikes roll along for considerable distances are > >> delusional, and all the videos showing the same thing are faked. > > No, what's silly is that you waste so much time making up stuff like > > this to "respond" to. > > Nothing was made up. Not true, though you do cut and paste the work of others more than you ever have an original thought. >I just quote and reply to the idiocy. It's > fun, and it also provides a valuable service to readers who might > actually believe the nonsense. > Only idiocy I see here is you and a couple of other dumbass trolls/ racists and morons.
From: S'mee on 12 Jul 2010 11:25 On Jul 12, 9:21 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > S'mee wrote: > > Let me make this simple > > As if you could ever make it any other way, ya barely literate, > helpless, hysterical, emotional, ignorant, confused, and deluded > sheep... <chuckle> > Speak for yourself. I make it simple so uneducated unthinking retards like you understand what is being said.
From: S'mee on 12 Jul 2010 11:26 On Jul 12, 7:52 am, CindiK <cindi.k...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 11, 10:29 pm, "S'mee" <stevenkei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jul 11, 4:28 pm, "Stephen!" <N...(a)spam.com> wrote: > > > > CindiK <cindi.k...(a)gmail.com> wrote in news:ca36e708-0930-4f23-9646- > > > 93f5a7de0...(a)t10g2000yqg.googlegroups.com: > > > > > I know the angular momentum of the driveshaft in shaft-driven bikes > > > > makes it impossible for them to wheelie. > > > > Nice presentation. Oughta catch a few with that cast. > > > She did, not bad for a dullsville rider. 8^) > > The catching is easy. I'm less fond of the taking them off the hook > and gutting and cleaning them. Them's the rules kid. You catch it you clean it and mom will cook it. 8^)
From: Henry on 12 Jul 2010 12:04
S'mee wrote: > Only idiocy I see And only idiocy you write... -- "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org |