From: The Older Gentleman on 25 May 2010 02:17 don (Calgary) <hd.flhr(a)telus.net> wrote: > Maybe the news > organizations were waiting for the oil to wash up in the wetlands and > marshes before rasing the profile of the story. You have *no idea* who the news media works, do you? None *whatsoever*. > The US government is just posturing. They're talking a good fight but > they simply do not have the resources or the expertise to perform the > kind of work required to cap the well. They also run the risk of > being too prescriptive with their instructions to BP, which could > undermine their legal claim against BP for damages. > > BP seems to be of the same mind as Neil, it's no big deal. Wrong again, You're inventing what I say, for the third time. It *is* a big deal. But it *will* happen again. Hopefully, at this rate, somewhere in your back yard. It might make you think a bit. -- BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F Triumph Street Triple Suzuki TS250ER GN250 Damn, back to six bikes! Try Googling before asking a damn silly question. chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
From: Chuck Rhode on 25 May 2010 10:56 On Tue, 25 May 2010 04:13:31 -0700, TOG(a)Toil wrote: > Now, what can we do about those silly bastards who tie teddy bears > to trees every time some kid is killed crossing the road? Potlatches are a time-honored tradition and good for the economy. -- ... Be Seeing You, ... Chuck Rhode, Sheboygan, WI, USA ... Weather: http://LacusVeris.com/WX ... 69° — Wind SSE 8 mph
From: J. Clarke on 25 May 2010 11:19 On 5/25/2010 2:17 AM, The Older Gentleman wrote: > don (Calgary)<hd.flhr(a)telus.net> wrote: > >> Maybe the news >> organizations were waiting for the oil to wash up in the wetlands and >> marshes before rasing the profile of the story. > > You have *no idea* who the news media works, do you? None *whatsoever*. > > >> The US government is just posturing. They're talking a good fight but >> they simply do not have the resources or the expertise to perform the >> kind of work required to cap the well. They also run the risk of >> being too prescriptive with their instructions to BP, which could >> undermine their legal claim against BP for damages. >> >> BP seems to be of the same mind as Neil, it's no big deal. > > Wrong again, You're inventing what I say, for the third time. It *is* a > big deal. But it *will* happen again. Hopefully, at this rate, somewhere > in your back yard. It might make you think a bit. More likely in yours I would think. After all, it is _British_ Petroleum that dropped the ball. Can't blame us bumbling Yanks for that one.
From: The Older Gentleman on 25 May 2010 14:31 J. Clarke <jclarke.usenet(a)cox.net> wrote: > More likely in yours I would think. After all, it is _British_ > Petroleum that dropped the ball. Can't blame us bumbling Yanks for that > one. Heh. I think BP is playing a very canny (if somewhat reprehensible) game actually. Sooner or later, the heat will go off them and be directed at the US regulators who didn't do their job properly either. -- BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F Triumph Street Triple Suzuki TS250ER GN250 Damn, back to six bikes! Try Googling before asking a damn silly question. chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
From: don (Calgary) on 25 May 2010 21:01 On Tue, 25 May 2010 07:17:10 +0100, totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk (The Older Gentleman) wrote: >don (Calgary) <hd.flhr(a)telus.net> wrote: > >> Maybe the news >> organizations were waiting for the oil to wash up in the wetlands and >> marshes before rasing the profile of the story. > >You have *no idea* who the news media works, do you? None *whatsoever*. Actually I am quite well versed on how the news media works. > > >> The US government is just posturing. They're talking a good fight but >> they simply do not have the resources or the expertise to perform the >> kind of work required to cap the well. They also run the risk of >> being too prescriptive with their instructions to BP, which could >> undermine their legal claim against BP for damages. >> >> BP seems to be of the same mind as Neil, it's no big deal. > >Wrong again, You're inventing what I say, for the third time. It *is* a >big deal. But it *will* happen again. Hopefully, at this rate, somewhere >in your back yard. It might make you think a bit. You must have a lot of bitterness buried in your soul to wish an environmental catastrophe in my back yard, or any ones back yard for that matter. You ought to think about that for a bit.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Calgary should enjoy this pic Next: The song my motor sings |