Prev: Going to Albuquerque
Next: 419's are HOOT!!!
From: little man upon the stair on 30 Oct 2009 20:19 On Oct 30, 2:01 pm, Sean_Q_ <no.s...(a)no.spam> wrote: > Are these apparently unprovoked flames against Mr. Schiffner only > the visible portion of some massive conflict going on behind the scenes? "Unprovoked," sez Paddy, innocently... If Keith would only display some equanimity and tolerance, more than half the noise in reeky would vanish...
From: S'mee on 30 Oct 2009 22:21 On Oct 30, 6:19 pm, little man upon the stair <macmi...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 30, 2:01 pm, Sean_Q_ <no.s...(a)no.spam> wrote: > > > Are these apparently unprovoked flames against Mr. Schiffner only > > the visible portion of some massive conflict going on behind the scenes? > > "Unprovoked," sez Paddy, innocently... > > If Keith would only display some equanimity and tolerance, more than > half the noise in reeky would vanish... Sorry child abuser(I'd never call you a pedarast) but I'll treat people like you and marty deserive. Abuse verbally when you are past arms reach and kill when I get my hands on you. Now chickenhawk...go chase some mexican children, we know what kind of predator you are.
From: Twibil on 31 Oct 2009 04:11 On Oct 31, 12:21 am, "S'mee" <stevenkei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I have always had it for all people except racists... > > > No, you've momentarily forgotton that you hate Californians too. > > > Think of those sweet young girls waltzing through Balboa Park in short- > > shorts during January and it will probably all come back to you in a > > rush. > > Malnourished, vain, cell phone glued to their heads...no thanks. Hmmm. I'm afraid you've been *badly* misinformed, but it's all good: leaves more for the rest of us.
From: S'mee on 31 Oct 2009 10:47 On Oct 31, 2:11 am, Twibil <nowayjo...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 31, 12:21 am, "S'mee" <stevenkei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I have always had it for all people except racists... > > > > No, you've momentarily forgotton that you hate Californians too. > > > > Think of those sweet young girls waltzing through Balboa Park in short- > > > shorts during January and it will probably all come back to you in a > > > rush. > > > Malnourished, vain, cell phone glued to their heads...no thanks. > > Hmmm. I'm afraid you've been *badly* misinformed, but it's all good: > leaves more for the rest of us. Anyway After being married 20 years...ah why bother explaining to you single guys why I don't even really do is GLANCE at the brolly girls. That and I've standards, IF they are young enough to be my own child I wont touch them at all! That means...28 and younger is TOO young. 8^ ( to bad for them. ;^)
From: little man upon the stair on 31 Oct 2009 11:28
On Oct 31, 7:47 am, "S'mee" <stevenkei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Anyway After being married 20 years...ah why bother explaining to you > single guys why I don't even really do is GLANCE at the brolly girls. > That and I've standards, IF they are young enough to be my own child I > wont touch them at all! That means...28 and younger is TOO young. 8^ > ( to bad for them. A 28-year old female would definitely be a cougar to your 16-year old emotional viewpoint... |