From: Colin Irvine on
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 12:32:38 -0000, Pip squeezed out the following:

>In article <9rckh5dlo3vp4c4tbqd8kfrh91vfgol2ds(a)4ax.com>, Colin Irvine
>says...
>
>> My current favourite is a 16-year-old Bushmills. Being whiskey it has
>> no peat at all.
>
>Point of order, Sir. Not /all/ whiskey is peat-free: the Connemara is
>peated:
>
>http://www.whiskymag.com/whisky/brand/connemara/whisky282.html

Humph. Well I suppose my informant, at the Jameson Old Midleton
Distillery, might not count them.

--
Colin Irvine
ZZR1400 BOF#33 BONY#34 COFF#06 BHaLC#5
http://www.colinandpat.co.uk
From: Pip on
In article <vnmkh5tjpbp1sh7nj21buhb09iit2tjdav(a)4ax.com>, Colin Irvine
says...
>
> On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 12:32:38 -0000, Pip squeezed out the following:
>
> >In article <9rckh5dlo3vp4c4tbqd8kfrh91vfgol2ds(a)4ax.com>, Colin Irvine
> >says...
> >
> >> My current favourite is a 16-year-old Bushmills. Being whiskey it has
> >> no peat at all.
> >
> >Point of order, Sir. Not /all/ whiskey is peat-free: the Connemara is
> >peated:
> >
> >http://www.whiskymag.com/whisky/brand/connemara/whisky282.html
>
> Humph. Well I suppose my informant, at the Jameson Old Midleton
> Distillery, might not count them.

I don't count any of those infernal distaillations, those with the
extraneous "e", myself, never having found one that I like. But
Shirley, any fule kno that there's only one peated Irish.

--

Pip, the "Mechanical Nightmare" (tm Bonwick Major)
From: Domènec on
"doetnietcomputeren" <doesnotcompute(a)gmail.com> escribi� en el mensaje de
noticias news:2009120511370591745-doesnotcompute(a)gmailcom...
> On 2009-12-05 11:20:51 +0100, Colin Irvine <look(a)bottom.of.home.page>
> said:
>
>> My current favourite is a 16-year-old Bushmills. Being whiskey it has
>> no peat at all.
> <tone of disgust>
> "Bushmills? That's protestant whisky!"
> </tod>
> (I'm expecting Champ to pick this one up.)

Scotland <-> Kafflicks?

From: zymurgy on
On 4 Dec, 18:09, Jim <n...(a)0.0.0.0> wrote:
> Domènec wrote:
> > *That* 15 years old bottling does not appear, but there are some 10 y-o and
> > a 14 y-o getting from 89 to 95 points. Murray's scale is in his very own
> > words:
>
> > 85-89 Very good to excellent whiskies definitely worth buying
> > 90-93 Brilliant.
> > 94-97 Superstar whiskies that give us all a reason to live.
> > 98-100 Better that anything I'eve ever tasted.
>
> > So I'm getting my bottle as Colin has been told. Hope someone can UR it to
> > central London on jan 22/23.
>
> > Murray's opinions on Longrow usually include the words "peat" and "salty".
> > Is it summat similar to, say, Caol Ila?

The definitive salty peaty would be Highland Park.

> The canonical peaty whisky would be Ardbeg.

Err, Laphroaig shirley ?

Paul.
From: Jim on
zymurgy wrote:
>> > Murray's opinions on Longrow usually include the words "peat" and "salty".
>> > Is it summat similar to, say, Caol Ila?
>
> The definitive salty peaty would be Highland Park.
>
>> The canonical peaty whisky would be Ardbeg.
>
> Err, Laphroaig shirley ?

Having tasted the whole lot of them back-to-back earlier this year, I
reckon Ardbeg. YMMV of course.

Scientifically, the peat smoke contains phenols, and these can be
measured, so you get a list like this (numbers are in parts per million):

Bunnahabhain (1�2)
Bruichladdich (3�4)
Springbank (7�8)
Benromach (8)
Ardmore (10�15)
Highland Park (20)
Bowmore (20�25)
Talisker (25�30)
Caol Ila (30�35)
Ledaig (35)
Lagavulin (35�40)
Port Charlotte (40)
Laphroaig (40�43)
Ardbeg (55)
Longrow (55)