From: tomorrow on
On Jul 15, 9:32 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:
> tomor...(a)erols.com wrote:
> > On Jul 13, 11:43 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:
> >> tomor...(a)erols.com wrote:
> >>> On Jul 13, 11:43 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:
> >>>> tomor...(a)erols.com wrote:
> >>>>> I'm not playing word games.
> >>>>  When you try to tell us that, "equally true whether said bike
> >>>> is moving or at rest" actually means true for a bike at rest,
> >>>> but not true for a bike that's moving, that's a word game,
> >>>> and a very silly one... <vbg>
> >>> I love it when you pretend to be even STUPIDER than you demonstrably
> >>> and reliably are.
> >>  The "logic" cited above is yours and only yours, Tim. But it is
> >> indeed quite stupid. Thanks for keeping me smiling... <g>
> > That's not me, Hank,
>
>   Someone is forging your posts? The nerve of 'em!
>
> > that's your insanity.
>
>   Speaking of insanity, it looks like you're a little too
> confused to tell us whether you agree with twitbull's quote
> below or not. Originally you said it's "entirely correct",
> but then you changed your mind and said you don't believe
> it. Which is it today? ;-)
>
>   "Note: Left to it's own devices, a non-sidecar bike will
> fall right over. And this is equally true whether said bike
> is moving or at rest. It's only the kickstand when at rest,
> or the rider's constant corrections when moving, that keep
> it upright."
>
>   Do you agree with twitbull's quote above or not, Tim? Can
> you try to clear your mind for a moment and be up front and
> honest? If you really think that's "entirely correct", then
> you're denying that the gyroscopic forces of the rotating
> wheels increase the stability of a moving motorcycle.
>   By the way, if I've written anything that you find confusing
> or contradictory, feel free to quote it and I'll clear it up.
> Unlike some here, I don't have to hide from my own words.... <g>

And this, folks, is the point from which Henry gleefully adds *me* to
his ever-growing list of folks whom he describes as "hiding behind
killfiles" and being "timid" and "cowardly" and goes on to quote the
strawman that he has so carefully constructed as "proof" that they
can't or won't back up their own words.

It never occurs to Henry that this is what happens to EVERYONE who
EVER attempts to actually seriously discuss ANYTHING with him.

But, like the definition of the insane, he will continue doing the
same thing over, and over, and over, and over again, getting the same
result every single time, but hoping against hope that somehow, the
next time, the results will be different.

Get a life, Henry. You truly have become the ultimate bore.