From: Eiron on
On 27/04/2010 09:02, TOG(a)Toil wrote:
> Speed trap on London Bridge. Jeez, that's six points in ten days. Best
> slow down a bit (not that I can slow down much more as I was on the
> GN250).
>
> Telling Plod you can't produce your licence because it's at Swansea
> for three speeding points to be added to it raises some eyebrows, too.
> Luckily I had a photocopy.

You should have taken the opportunity to ask about the legality of the
knife you were carrying. :-)

--
Eiron.
From: AW on

> > Speed trap on London Bridge.



Saw it, vaguely surprised they didn't tug me - black visor, open
pipes, maybe a bit quick..
From: Colin Irvine on
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 12:40:42 +0100, YTC#1 squeezed out the following:

>On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:29:19 +0100, Daz wrote:
>
>> On 27/04/2010 10:23, petrolcan wrote:
>>
>>> On for four years and points does not equal a conviction.
>>
>> Any ins co I've ever dealt with asks the standard question "Any accidents,
>> claims or convictions in the last x years" for which the latter definitely
>> included points.
>>
>> So if you got 3 points for either speeding or perhaps an illegal tyre you
>> wouldn't declare this when asked the above question?
>
>Hmm, it ammounts to what a conviction means.
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conviction
>http://www.google.co.uk/dictionary?aq=f&langpair=en|en&hl=en&q=conviction
>
>
>If you don't go to court, are you "convicted".

Well you're hardly innocent.

--
Colin Irvine
ZZR1400 BOF#33 BONY#34 COFF#06 BHaLC#5
http://www.colinandpat.co.uk
From: YTC#1 on
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:02:03 +0100, Colin Irvine wrote:

> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 12:40:42 +0100, YTC#1 squeezed out the following:
>
>>On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:29:19 +0100, Daz wrote:
>>
>>> On 27/04/2010 10:23, petrolcan wrote:
>>>
>>>> On for four years and points does not equal a conviction.
>>>
>>> Any ins co I've ever dealt with asks the standard question "Any
>>> accidents, claims or convictions in the last x years" for which the
>>> latter definitely included points.
>>>
>>> So if you got 3 points for either speeding or perhaps an illegal tyre
>>> you wouldn't declare this when asked the above question?
>>
>>Hmm, it ammounts to what a conviction means.
>>
>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conviction
>>http://www.google.co.uk/dictionary?aq=f&langpair=en|
en&hl=en&q=conviction
>>
>>
>>If you don't go to court, are you "convicted".
>
> Well you're hardly innocent.

No the same thing, being guilty and being convicted are separate things.
From: zymurgy on
On Apr 27, 9:08 am, "CT" <m...(a)christrollen.co.uk> wrote:
> TOG(a)Toil wrote:
>
> Oh, I see you speak fluent "Nige".

heh, I saw what he did there ..

Paul.