From: Eiron on 27 Apr 2010 12:23 On 27/04/2010 09:02, TOG(a)Toil wrote: > Speed trap on London Bridge. Jeez, that's six points in ten days. Best > slow down a bit (not that I can slow down much more as I was on the > GN250). > > Telling Plod you can't produce your licence because it's at Swansea > for three speeding points to be added to it raises some eyebrows, too. > Luckily I had a photocopy. You should have taken the opportunity to ask about the legality of the knife you were carrying. :-) -- Eiron.
From: AW on 27 Apr 2010 13:01 > > Speed trap on London Bridge. Saw it, vaguely surprised they didn't tug me - black visor, open pipes, maybe a bit quick..
From: Colin Irvine on 27 Apr 2010 14:02 On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 12:40:42 +0100, YTC#1 squeezed out the following: >On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:29:19 +0100, Daz wrote: > >> On 27/04/2010 10:23, petrolcan wrote: >> >>> On for four years and points does not equal a conviction. >> >> Any ins co I've ever dealt with asks the standard question "Any accidents, >> claims or convictions in the last x years" for which the latter definitely >> included points. >> >> So if you got 3 points for either speeding or perhaps an illegal tyre you >> wouldn't declare this when asked the above question? > >Hmm, it ammounts to what a conviction means. > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conviction >http://www.google.co.uk/dictionary?aq=f&langpair=en|en&hl=en&q=conviction > > >If you don't go to court, are you "convicted". Well you're hardly innocent. -- Colin Irvine ZZR1400 BOF#33 BONY#34 COFF#06 BHaLC#5 http://www.colinandpat.co.uk
From: YTC#1 on 27 Apr 2010 14:46 On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:02:03 +0100, Colin Irvine wrote: > On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 12:40:42 +0100, YTC#1 squeezed out the following: > >>On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:29:19 +0100, Daz wrote: >> >>> On 27/04/2010 10:23, petrolcan wrote: >>> >>>> On for four years and points does not equal a conviction. >>> >>> Any ins co I've ever dealt with asks the standard question "Any >>> accidents, claims or convictions in the last x years" for which the >>> latter definitely included points. >>> >>> So if you got 3 points for either speeding or perhaps an illegal tyre >>> you wouldn't declare this when asked the above question? >> >>Hmm, it ammounts to what a conviction means. >> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conviction >>http://www.google.co.uk/dictionary?aq=f&langpair=en| en&hl=en&q=conviction >> >> >>If you don't go to court, are you "convicted". > > Well you're hardly innocent. No the same thing, being guilty and being convicted are separate things.
From: zymurgy on 27 Apr 2010 15:02
On Apr 27, 9:08 am, "CT" <m...(a)christrollen.co.uk> wrote: > TOG(a)Toil wrote: > > Oh, I see you speak fluent "Nige". heh, I saw what he did there .. Paul. |