Theres a little fucker
in [UK Motorcycles]
|
From: Lozzo on 13 Apr 2010 14:42 Cab wrote: > greybeard wibbled forthrightly: > > > > Are you happy that your dogs are so well trained they attack > > > anybody that goes into your back garden? > > > > > > I'm fully in favour of giving burglars a bit of a kicking if you > > > catch them in your house but I'm not overly keen on dogs that > > > attack and leave someone as you describe above. > > > > Best you don't break into his garden then! :o) > > > > If the fucker hadn't gone in the garden, the dog's would have been > > no threat or problem to him. He fed himself to them. > > That'd be my take on it too. And mine. -- Lozzo Versys 650 Tourer, CBR600F-W racebike in the making, TS250C, RD400F (somewhere)
From: Champ on 13 Apr 2010 14:47 On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:19:39 +0100, Andy Bonwick <nospam(a)bonwick.me.uk> wrote: >My view on dogs that attack people is that they should be shot and the >owner charged for the bullet. Me too. I hate dogs. -- Champ We declare that the splendor of the world has been enriched by a new beauty: the beauty of speed. ZX10R | Hayabusa | GPz750turbo neal at champ dot org dot uk
From: Champ on 13 Apr 2010 14:51 On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 08:04:30 +0100, "greybeard" <nothere(a)nowhere.com> wrote: >"Steve" <steveloukes(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> Nasty - when you were a kid did you never go into someones >> garden to get your ball back? >Nope, never. There seems to be quite a definite split here, between those who never did, and those who considered it a dare. I certainly recall a group of us, around 8 or 9 years old, daring each other to jump the hedge and get the ball from the scary old man (he seemed ancient to us - was probably only about 60!) who wouldn't give any kids their balls back. -- Champ We declare that the splendor of the world has been enriched by a new beauty: the beauty of speed. ZX10R | Hayabusa | GPz750turbo neal at champ dot org dot uk
From: Nige on 13 Apr 2010 14:52 Champ wrote: > On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:19:39 +0100, Andy Bonwick > <nospam(a)bonwick.me.uk> wrote: > >> My view on dogs that attack people is that they should be shot and the >> owner charged for the bullet. > > Me too. > > I hate dogs. Me too, but i like them more than burglars. -- Nige, Land Rover 90 Yamaha R1 Range Rover Vogue
From: Charlie on 13 Apr 2010 14:57
On 13/04/2010 18:40, des hanging around for a while wrote: > On 2010-04-13, DozynSleepy<nospamplease(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 13/04/2010 15:13, steve auvache wrote: >> snip >>> >>> Just be careful what you say, plod are obliged to be professionally >>> neutral in these matters and as my dear old dead mate Budgie used to >>> say, "you are only ever guilty by your own admission." >>> >>> >> >> American biased but surprising relevant to our own society. >> >> "Why I am proud to admit that I will never talk to any police officer" >> by Professor James Duane >> >> Always worth posting a link again. >> >> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4097602514885833865# >> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6014022229458915912# > > Maybe worth posting, but in the main, completely useless to Britons. You > don't have the right to silence, you don't have protection against > arbitrary search, seizure or arrest. In short, British people have no > rights that cannot be removed by decree, 'D notice' or organic law. Britons have the same right to silence that (for example) the Septics do. They are read much the same caution at the time of arrest, and retain the inalienable right to say absolutely nothing under interview. One right that Britons do have, that is not enjoyed by many other nations (such as the French, as confirmed by several recent cases of over-enthusiastic policing), is that of habeas corpus. You could ask some of your chums in the IDF about Military Order 378 and its abuse, colloquially known by the soldiers as 'tertur'. |