Who was it said the planet was cooling?
in [Motorcycles]
|
Prev: The Crest Re-Opens!
Next: Solstice Party
From: Twibil on 15 Dec 2009 01:34 On Dec 14, 7:42 pm, Kevin <kevyNOS...(a)netins.net> wrote: > > > ya I get to the study by the associated Press and quit. they are one of the > extream liberal press papers that has pushed this hoax all along. why would > I want to beleive anything they supposedly found out. I call BS KB Brilliant: anything that appears in a publication you don't like is "BS". "Extream liberal press" says it all.
From: Twibil on 15 Dec 2009 01:44 On Dec 14, 10:17 pm, "J. Clarke" <jclarke.use...(a)cox.net> wrote: > > > > So is all science a money chase, or just when > > it reaches conclusions that people don't like ? > > Just when it demands 45 trillion dollars in payments that somehow magically > are going to cool the Earth. Ah! So you're dumb enough to believe that because your pajamas are purple it will rain next Tuesday. (Hint: The fact that somebody will instantly figure out a way to profit from Armageddon ten seconds after God announces it's actual date has absolutely nothing to do with the question of whether or not Armageddon is really coming. None. Zero. Zip. Nada.) Sorry Bob (Looks abashed, kicks toe in dirt.) It was just too good to pass up.
From: Rob Kleinschmidt on 15 Dec 2009 11:13 On Dec 14, 10:17 pm, "J. Clarke" <jclarke.use...(a)cox.net> wrote: > Rob Kleinschmidt wrote: > > On Dec 14, 7:44 pm, Kevin <kevyNOS...(a)netins.net> wrote: > >> Twibil <nowayjo...(a)gmail.com> wrote in news:50a87d85-031a-413d-b762- > >> d7d04bb5f...(a)j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com: > > >>> On Dec 14, 1:08 am, "Bob Myers" <nospample...(a)address.invalid> > >>> wrote: > > >>>> It occurs to me, reading through this now-nearly-endless > >>>> thread, that you are engaged in arguing a point which is a > >>>> matter of essentially religious belief on the part of your > >>>> opponents. We both know how much future there is in doing something > >>>> like *that*. > > >>> Yup. That's when -and why- I walk away from a thread. > > >>> This gives the warming-deniers a chance to pretend that they've > >>> "won" something. > > >> No body wins when supposed science is found to just be a political > >> money chase. Except real science is the big looser. KB > > > So is all science a money chase, or just when > > it reaches conclusions that people don't like ? > > Just when it demands 45 trillion dollars in payments that somehow magically > are going to cool the Earth. Horseshit. "science" is chasing this money ? Science you don't like is a "money chase".
From: J. Clarke on 15 Dec 2009 11:52 Rob Kleinschmidt wrote: > On Dec 14, 10:17 pm, "J. Clarke" <jclarke.use...(a)cox.net> wrote: >> Rob Kleinschmidt wrote: >>> On Dec 14, 7:44 pm, Kevin <kevyNOS...(a)netins.net> wrote: >>>> Twibil <nowayjo...(a)gmail.com> wrote in >>>> news:50a87d85-031a-413d-b762- >>>> d7d04bb5f...(a)j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com: >> >>>>> On Dec 14, 1:08 am, "Bob Myers" <nospample...(a)address.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>> It occurs to me, reading through this now-nearly-endless >>>>>> thread, that you are engaged in arguing a point which is a >>>>>> matter of essentially religious belief on the part of your >>>>>> opponents. We both know how much future there is in doing >>>>>> something like *that*. >> >>>>> Yup. That's when -and why- I walk away from a thread. >> >>>>> This gives the warming-deniers a chance to pretend that they've >>>>> "won" something. >> >>>> No body wins when supposed science is found to just be a political >>>> money chase. Except real science is the big looser. KB >> >>> So is all science a money chase, or just when >>> it reaches conclusions that people don't like ? >> >> Just when it demands 45 trillion dollars in payments that somehow >> magically are going to cool the Earth. > > Horseshit. "science" is chasing this money ? > > Science you don't like is a "money chase". You really aren't paying attention to what the so-called scientists at IPCC are demanding at Copenhagen, are you?
From: .p.jm. on 15 Dec 2009 13:28
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:13:31 -0800 (PST), Rob Kleinschmidt <Rkleinsch1216128(a)aol.com> wrote: >On Dec 14, 10:17�pm, "J. Clarke" <jclarke.use...(a)cox.net> wrote: >> Rob Kleinschmidt wrote: >> > On Dec 14, 7:44 pm, Kevin <kevyNOS...(a)netins.net> wrote: >> >> Twibil <nowayjo...(a)gmail.com> wrote in news:50a87d85-031a-413d-b762- >> >> d7d04bb5f...(a)j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com: >> >> >>> On Dec 14, 1:08 am, "Bob Myers" <nospample...(a)address.invalid> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >>>> It occurs to me, reading through this now-nearly-endless >> >>>> thread, that you are engaged in arguing a point which is a >> >>>> matter of essentially religious belief on the part of your >> >>>> opponents. We both know how much future there is in doing something >> >>>> like *that*. >> >> >>> Yup. �That's when -and why- I walk away from a thread. >> >> >>> This gives the warming-deniers a chance to pretend that they've >> >>> "won" something. >> >> >> � No body wins when supposed science is found to just be a political >> >> money chase. � Except real science is the big looser. � KB >> >> > So is all science a money chase, or just when >> > it reaches conclusions that people don't like ? >> >> Just when it demands 45 trillion dollars in payments that somehow magically >> are going to cool the Earth. > >Horseshit. "science" is chasing this money ? > >Science you don't like is a "money chase". 'Science' that says ; Hide the decline ( trend in data ) Erase your emails Will not give up source data to anyone Will erase the source data first Will get peer-review supressed Will get the editor fired who published a peer review That ain't 'science'. -- Click here every day to feed an animal that needs you today !!! www.theanimalrescuesite.com/ Paul ( pjm @ pobox . com ) - remove spaces to email me 'Some days, it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.' 'With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.' HVAC/R program for Palm PDA's Free demo online at www.pmilligan.net/palm/ Free 'People finder' program now at www.pmilligan.net/finder.htm |