Prev: My S40 could look this mean
Next: For the nosy types
From: S'mee on 13 Jun 2010 20:47
On Jun 13, 1:03 pm, * US * wrote:

> Something certainly has you unable to deal with the
> fact that PNAC wanted a "new Pearl Harbor".

Liar.
From: * US on 22 Jun 2010 09:19
"Further, the process of transformation,
even if it brings revolutionary change, is
likely to be a long one, absent some
catastrophic and catalyzing event � like a
new Pearl Harbor."

http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

Their own words.

Watch the bushworshipper writhe and spew fallacies rather than deal with reality.
From: * US on 24 Jun 2010 07:37
Ruppert's points remain undisputed.

Ruppert's a trained investigator.

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/

On Tue, 4 May 2010 20:34:45 -0700 (PDT), Iarnbored <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>BZZZZZT! WRONG!

You're wrong, and, because of that, you have no facts.

>... stupid kooker
>klaims... nutbag.

Tell us all about how you believe Bush and Cheney could
never do anything at all that'd get Americans killed with
deceit to profit the Carlyle Group and Halliburton.

>... failed to provide any evidence ...

You should just admit that you have none.

>Not one single FACT ...

You certainly haven't posted a fact, yet.

>...web of lies starting with ...

Tell us that one about how Bush and Cheney had no
idea any attack could possibly occur in the USA.
From: * US on 25 Jun 2010 08:20
http://www.911review.com/reason.html

Notice that no one can dispute what Ruppert
says about the means, motives, and opportunities
of 9/11.

Ruppert's points remain undisputed.

Ruppert's a trained investigator.

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/

On Tue, 4 May 2010 20:34:45 -0700 (PDT), Iarnbored <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>BZZZZZT! WRONG!

You're wrong, and, because of that, you have no facts.

>... stupid kooker
>klaims... nutbag.

Tell us all about how you believe Bush and Cheney could
never do anything at all that'd get Americans killed with
deceit to profit the Carlyle Group and Halliburton.

>... failed to provide any evidence ...

You should just admit that you have none.

>Not one single FACT ...

You certainly haven't posted a fact, yet.

>...web of lies starting with ...

Tell us that one about how Bush and Cheney had no
idea any attack could possibly occur in the USA.
From: * US on 29 Jun 2010 07:30
"The 9/11/01 Attack:
Means, Motive, and Precedent"

http://www.911review.com/reason.html

Notice that no one can dispute what Ruppert
says about the means, motives, and opportunities
of 9/11.

Ruppert's points remain undisputed.

Ruppert's a trained investigator.

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/

On Tue, 4 May 2010 20:34:45 -0700 (PDT), Iarnbored <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>BZZZZZT! WRONG!

You're wrong, and, because of that, you have no facts.

>... stupid kooker
>klaims... nutbag.

Tell us all about how you believe Bush and Cheney could
never do anything at all that'd get Americans killed with
deceit to profit the Carlyle Group and Halliburton.

>... failed to provide any evidence ...

You should just admit that you have none.

>Not one single FACT ...

You certainly haven't posted a fact, yet.

>...web of lies starting with ...

Tell us that one about how Bush and Cheney had no
idea any attack could possibly occur in the USA.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: My S40 could look this mean
Next: For the nosy types