Adolph the Great
in [Motorcycles]
|
From: Darwin123 on 8 Mar 2010 16:18 On Mar 5, 12:42 pm, climber <coledenk...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > http://www.adolfthegreat.com/ > > Stop. No bleating. Visit the site for in-depth view of many > positive National Socialist inititives. Pioneered laws protecting > animals, > cancer research, environmental protections, etc. > You are wrong. Biological and medical science in Germany almost died under Hitler. I recommend the following book: "Biologists Under Hitler" by Ute Deichmann" (Harvard, 1996). It describes how biological programs under Hitler became inefficient. The U.S. and Russia after WWII imported rocket scientists from Germany and biologists from Japan. If Germany had an effective biology program, the biologists in Germany would have been in far more demand. Hitler screwed the biology programs in Germany because of his superstitions and psychoses. Germany had plenty of good biologists before Hitler, and really good biological programs before Hitler. However, they put the most superstitious managers in charge of their programs. Being a racist was more important than having an organized mind. Also, biologists from other countries avoided working with German scientists. Without the help of other biologists, the German biologists could make little progress. A lot of the science in concentration camps was based on superstition rather than science. The laboratory managers wrote books on race classification. They did very little on real genetics. Basically, you got ahead by touting Nazi propaganda. The doctors who experimented in the concentration camps were basically insane. There is on exception that the book doesn't discuss. Conrad Lorenz was a really good evolutionary biologists. He did some good work in animal behavior. However, his work stands out because it is alone. He touted racist propaganda, but he also did mathematical analysis of behavior. His studies of behavior have proved robust. The Japanese had a real good biology program. Unfortunately, a lot of it was in the realm of germ warfare. The Japanese scum bags were as racist as the Germans. They murdered lots of people with their germs. They vivisected human beings, especially civilians. However, the scientists involved were not superstitious. They found out a lot about germs. However, they didn't place maniacs in charge of biology departments. Sadly, the Japanese involved these horrible experiments were basically sane. They objected at first, but did the horrible deeds anyway.
From: The Older Gentleman on 8 Mar 2010 16:21 Darwin123 <drosen0000(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > The Japanese scum bags > were as racist as the Germans. Not quite, no. -- BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F Triumph Street Triple Suzuki TS250ER GN250 Damn, back to six bikes! Try Googling before asking a damn silly question. chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
From: Twibil on 8 Mar 2010 16:43 On Mar 8, 12:17 pm, "S'mee" <stevenkei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > You are aware, of course, that TIME has repeatedly stated that > > "Man of the Year" (now "Person of the Year") doesn't necessarily > > go to someone to honor them - it's supposed to be the person who > > has had the biggest impact on the news for the year, whether for > > good or for bad. > > That's the way it started out also. I've understood that since I was > kid, what makes it so hard for the rest of the world to understand > that? I don't get you people. It's the same ingrown personality trait that causes people of all sorts to decry the ACLU because it has in the past defended someone - or some principal- that they disagree with. The fact that the ACLU is strictly non-partisan, and will defend *any* viewpoint -if they think there's a question of Constitutional law involved that needs to be clarified- never seems to cross these folks' minds: only the fact that ACLU once did something that *they* didn't like remains, and that's enough to inspire an irrational, life- long hatred. By that same line of reasoning, any magazine that puts someone like Hitler on bin Ladin on their cover must naturally be fawning upon them, QED. Never expect logic when you're dealing with the masses. Them asses.
From: Mark Olson on 8 Mar 2010 16:56 Twibil wrote: > The fact that the ACLU is strictly non-partisan, and will defend *any* > viewpoint -if they think there's a question of Constitutional law > involved that needs to be clarified- never seems to cross these > folks' minds: only the fact that ACLU once did something that *they* > didn't like remains, and that's enough to inspire an irrational, life- > long hatred. The ACLU may be non-partisan but they definitely have their political leanings: http://www.aclu.org/2008/07/01/heller-decision-and-the-second-amendment
From: saddlebag on 8 Mar 2010 18:07
On Mar 8, 9:57 am, "S'mee" <stevenkei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 8, 4:33 am, saddlebag <saddle...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 7, 11:01 pm, "tomor...(a)erols.com" > > > <tomorrowaterolsdot...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 7, 6:14 am, saddlebag <saddle...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 6, 7:48 pm, "tomor...(a)erols.com" > > > > > <tomorrowaterolsdot...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 6, 7:16 am, saddlebag <saddle...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > (snippola) > > > > > > > He wasn't nor are any of the rest of the fanatical morons. That is > > > > > > the point. > > > > > > You're attempting to DEBATE these sociopaths????? > > > > > > C'mon Saddlebags, you aren't that stupid. > > > > > I gave up when the nincompoop detailed how we are all going to be > > > > killed by the followers of Limbaugh in job lots, but yet he really > > > > wasn't a fan of Hitler. > > > > > Ya know, maybe Bu$h was right illegally spying on US citizens. It > > > > appears some of us NEED to be watched... > > > > Aw, c'mon... you ain't *that* dangerous! > > > Not me champ, I'm talking about the new right wing American holocaust > > fans who you like to identify with. > > > But you are correct, when Bu$h was in, I surely would have been one of > > the binary folks that was *dangerous* to their plan of unitary > > executive power. Just tough to build a kingdom without executing some > > folks I suppose...- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > So? You still aren't dangerous. To right wingers like your Gunner buddy, EVERYONE who isn't in lock step with their Nazi ideals is dangerous. "You are either with us or against us." -G.W. Bu$h |