Collapse vs Demolition
in [Motorcycles]
|
From: Ray Fischer on 23 Jul 2010 02:38 Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >Ray Fischer wrote: >> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >>> Ray Fischer wrote: > >>> So, what do you "think" caused this steel column to vaporize, >>> nut job? > >>> http://wtc.nist.gov/media/AppendixC-fema403_apc.pdf > >>> Here's proof that fires couldn't have caused it. > >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvQDFV1HINw&feature=player_embedded > >>> (this is where crazy Ray gets even more stupid and again >>> runs away from a challenge to address the hard evidence and >>> expert research) Thanks for proving my point again, ya >>> helpless, pitiful, clueless, and deluded sheep... <chuckle> > >> There was no demolition, kook. > > You failed to address the hard evidence and research again, Because there isn't any, crackpot. There are many videos showing actual airplanes flying into actual buildings. But you want to ignore that. Why? Because you're a paranoid nutcase. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: Ray Fischer on 23 Jul 2010 02:39 Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >Ray Fischer wrote: >> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: > >>> Please explain how WTC7 could have dropped at the rate of free fall > >> Easy. It didn't. > > You have a reputation for lying and being very stupid, so "Airplanes?!? There were no airplanes! It was a government demolition!" -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: Henry on 23 Jul 2010 08:12 Ray Fischer wrote: > Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >> Ray Fischer wrote: >>> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >>>> Ray Fischer wrote: >>>> So, what do you "think" caused this steel column to vaporize, >>>> nut job? >>>> http://wtc.nist.gov/media/AppendixC-fema403_apc.pdf >>>> Here's proof that fires couldn't have caused it. >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvQDFV1HINw&feature=player_embedded >>>> (this is where crazy Ray gets even more stupid and again >>>> runs away from a challenge to address the hard evidence and >>>> expert research) Thanks for proving my point again, ya >>>> helpless, pitiful, clueless, and deluded sheep... <chuckle> >>> There was no demolition, kook. >> You failed to address the hard evidence and research again, > Because there isn't any, crackpot. So, as a psychotically deluded and lying imbecile, what would you call the evidence and research that FEMA has on this link, if not evidence and research? http://wtc.nist.gov/media/AppendixC-fema403_apc.pdf No offense, but you really do appear to be mentally ill. What do you "think" caused that steel column to melt and vaporize, nut job? Here's proof that fires couldn't have caused it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvQDFV1HINw&feature=player_embedded > There are many videos showing actual airplanes flying into actual > buildings. Wow, that's the first accurate statement you've made, nut job. Very impressive, but of course, totally irrelevant to the discussion. Just out of curiosity, how many planes do you "think" hit WTC7, ya psychotic, helpless, deluded, emotional, drivel spewing imbecile? <chuckle> -- "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: Henry on 28 Jul 2010 08:30 Ray Fischer wrote: > Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >> Ray Fischer wrote: >>> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >>>> Ray Fischer wrote: >>>> So, what do you "think" caused this steel column to vaporize, >>>> nut job? >>>> http://wtc.nist.gov/media/AppendixC-fema403_apc.pdf >>>> Here's proof that fires couldn't have caused it. >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvQDFV1HINw&feature=player_embedded >>>> (this is where crazy Ray gets even more stupid and again >>>> runs away from a challenge to address the hard evidence and >>>> expert research) Thanks for proving my point again, ya >>>> helpless, pitiful, clueless, and deluded sheep... <chuckle> >>> There was no demolition, kook. >> You failed to address the hard evidence and research again, > Because there isn't any, crackpot. So, as a psychotically deluded and lying imbecile, what would you call the evidence and research that FEMA has on this link, if not evidence and research? http://wtc.nist.gov/media/AppendixC-fema403_apc.pdf No offense, but you really do appear to be mentally ill. What do you "think" caused that steel column to melt and vaporize, nut job? Here's proof that fires couldn't have caused it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvQDFV1HINw&feature=player_embedded > There are many videos showing actual airplanes flying into actual > buildings. Wow, that's the first accurate statement you've made, nut job. Very impressive, but of course, totally irrelevant to the discussion. Just out of curiosity, how many planes do you "think" hit WTC7, ya psychotic, helpless, deluded, emotional, drivel spewing imbecile? <chuckle> -- "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: Ray Fischer on 29 Jul 2010 13:53
Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: > > As predicted, Bob became very quiet when he was challenged Your "challenges" are little more than lying about what people post in order to repeat your insane conspiracy theories. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net |