Collapse vs Demolition
in [Motorcycles]
|
From: Curly Surmudgeon on 17 Jul 2010 16:53 On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 06:20:01 +0000, rfischer(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: > Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >>Ray Fischer wrote: >>> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >>>> Ray Fischer wrote: >>>>> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote: >> >>>>>>> You claim that "melted and vaporized steel columns" could support >>>>>>> "several times [their] own weight". >> >>>>>> No, I never made that claim. >> >>>>> Those are your words. >> >>>> Actually, they're your words. That's why the attributes that >>>> refer to them read, "Ray Fisher wrote". >> >>> Smirk. Looks like it says "Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote". >> >> More proof that you lack the intelligence to follow a thread - > > More proof that you're a crazy dumbass. Stand back and look at what you've just posted. If you're hoping to portray Henry as a wacko you just shot yourself in the foot. -- Regards, Curly ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lest we forget: Scott McInnis ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Ray Fischer on 17 Jul 2010 17:57 Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySurmudgeon(a)live.com> wrote: > rfischer(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) >> Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySurmudgeon(a)live.com> wrote: >>>On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:26:03 -0700, Twibil <nowayjose6(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Jul 15, 11:48 pm, rfisc...(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You're insane, aren't you? >>>> >>>> It took you this long to figure it out? >>>> >>>> Poor Henry has been a textbook case of a perfectly normal guy who >>>> slipped into psychosis over an extended period of time, and he did so >>>> right before everyone's eyes on Usenet. He's no longer able to >>>> distinguish reality from his fanatsies, and unfortunately he gets >>>> worse and worse as time goes on. So don't bother debating with him or >>>> getting mad (unless you enjoy that sort of thing): it's a waste of >>>> time. >>>> >>>> He isn't responsible for what he posts, and actually believes the >>>> things he says: even when you show him what he himself said two posts >>>> ago he will blandly deny that he ever said such a thing, and he will >>>> believe it 100%. He will also claim that you said things you never >>>> even suggested, and will continue making those claims for years >>>> afterwards, even though everyone knows that he's simply inventing his >>>> facts as he goes along. >>>> >>>> It's sad, but this sort of thing happens to people from time to time, >>>> and so far as I'm aware there is no cure. >>> >>>From the bleachers it appears that you and Ray are the wackos. >>> >>>Henry sticks to the issues, you two engage in character assassination. >> >> In one post he claimed that the building couldn't collapse as fast >> as it did because steel columns were designed to support "several times >> [their] own weight". The he referred to the "melted and vaporized >> steel columns" in the wreakage. >> >> Those two statements are mutually incompatible. > >Then make that point rather than character assassination. I did. The lunatic denied having written those words. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: Ray Fischer on 17 Jul 2010 17:58 Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySurmudgeon(a)live.com> wrote: > rfischer(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) >> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >>>Ray Fischer wrote: >>>> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >>>>> Ray Fischer wrote: >>>>>> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >>>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote: >>> >>>>>>>> You claim that "melted and vaporized steel columns" could support >>>>>>>> "several times [their] own weight". >>> >>>>>>> No, I never made that claim. >>> >>>>>> Those are your words. >>> >>>>> Actually, they're your words. That's why the attributes that >>>>> refer to them read, "Ray Fisher wrote". >>> >>>> Smirk. Looks like it says "Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote". >>> >>> More proof that you lack the intelligence to follow a thread - >> >> More proof that you're a crazy dumbass. > >Stand back and look at what you've just posted. If you're hoping to >portray Henry as a wacko you just shot yourself in the foot. Maybe you just "lack the intelligence to follow a thread". And will you get the point? -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: Curly Surmudgeon on 17 Jul 2010 20:41 On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:58:10 +0000, rfischer(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: > Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySurmudgeon(a)live.com> wrote: >> rfischer(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) >>> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >>>>Ray Fischer wrote: >>>>> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote: >>>>>>> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>> You claim that "melted and vaporized steel columns" could >>>>>>>>> support "several times [their] own weight". >>>> >>>>>>>> No, I never made that claim. >>>> >>>>>>> Those are your words. >>>> >>>>>> Actually, they're your words. That's why the attributes that >>>>>> refer to them read, "Ray Fisher wrote". >>>> >>>>> Smirk. Looks like it says "Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote". >>>> >>>> More proof that you lack the intelligence to follow a thread - >>> >>> More proof that you're a crazy dumbass. >> >>Stand back and look at what you've just posted. If you're hoping to >>portray Henry as a wacko you just shot yourself in the foot. > > Maybe you just "lack the intelligence to follow a thread". > > And will you get the point? That's why you're losing the debate. -- Regards, Curly ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lest we forget: Scott McInnis ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Twibil on 17 Jul 2010 22:48
On Jul 17, 5:41 pm, Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySurmudg...(a)live.com> wrote: > > > That's why you're losing the debate. Free hints for "Curly": 1.) There is no "debate", and there's nothing to "lose" except wasted time. There are merely several fruitcakes repeating "I know you are but what am I?" to each other, over and over. 2.) Repetition can never make an untruth into a truth. This includes *your* repetitions. |