Collapse vs Demolition
in [Motorcycles]
|
From: Henry on 15 Jul 2010 09:20 Ray Fischer wrote: > Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >> Ray Fischer wrote: >>> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >>> You claim that "melted and vaporized steel columns" could support >>> "several times [their] own weight". >> No, I never made that claim. > And once again you retreat behind lies. Your reading comprehension has failed you again. I'm challenging you to back up your lie with a quote. Please produce the post where I said that melted and vaporized columns could support several times their own weight. Hell, just post a quote that even remotely implies that. Or, continue to back pedal, weasel, and prove my point for me again - which of course, is that not only are you a gullible, weak minded fool, but a blatant liar. >>> Wow... First, if an object or structure accelerates at the rate of >>> free fall, *all* of its gravitational potential energy has been >>> converted to motion, and no energy is available to crush, bend, >>> and break 10s of thousands of tons of structural steel. Obviously >>> that would *greatly* reduce or stop the acceleration. A steel >>> structure that's capable of supporting several times the weight >>> of the building would produce significant resistance. Free fall can >>> only take place when there is no resistance. >>> Look at some of the presentations on this website. The author is a >>> physics teacher and presents the information very articulately. >>> Let us know if you disagree with any of his research. It's been peer >>> reviewed, and so far, no one has been able to find any errors. >>> http://www.911speakout.org/ >> I don't accept your premise. > Do you disagree with any of the research on the website? If so, can > you tell us what and why, exactly? I see that you haven't been able to find any errors. Unlike the government lies that you've been mindlessly parroting, the information I post is very well researched and and well documented. So far, not one cave man conspiracy theorist has been able to cite even one inaccurate or misleading claim or fact. Thanks for demonstrating that for us yet again... -- "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: Ray Fischer on 15 Jul 2010 13:05 Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >Ray Fischer wrote: >> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >>> Ray Fischer wrote: >>>> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: > >>>> You claim that "melted and vaporized steel columns" could support >>>> "several times [their] own weight". > >>> No, I never made that claim. > >> And once again you retreat behind lies. > > Your reading comprehension has failed you again. Your insane afanaticism blinds you to even your own words. > I'm challenging >you to back up your lie with a quote. I did quote you. Your words are still present above. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: Ray Fischer on 15 Jul 2010 13:05 Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >Ray Fischer wrote: >> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: > >> You claim that "melted and vaporized steel columns" could support >> "several times [their] own weight". > > No, I never made that claim. Those are your words. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: spudnik on 15 Jul 2010 13:18 the question is not collapse vs. demolition, but catastrophic collapse with controlled or uncontrolled (sik) demolition. I mean, come on, all of you, Muzlim Fizkiksts! --les ducs d'oil! http://tarpley.net --forsooth, the Queen of the quadrivium! http://wlym.com
From: Henry on 15 Jul 2010 13:44
Ray Fischer wrote: > Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >> Ray Fischer wrote: >>> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >>>> Ray Fischer wrote: >>>>> Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >>>>> You claim that "melted and vaporized steel columns" could support >>>>> "several times [their] own weight". >>>> No, I never made that claim. >>> And once again you retreat behind lies. >> Your reading comprehension has failed you again. I'm challenging >> you to back up your lie with a quote. Please produce the post >> where I said that melted and vaporized columns could support >> several times their own weight. Hell, just post a quote that >> even remotely implies that. Or, continue to back pedal, weasel, >> and prove my point for me again - which of course, is that not >> only are you a gullible, weak minded fool, but a blatant liar. > I did quote you. Your words are still present above. You wrote that, not me. You're lying and you failed to produce a quote. But that was expected, you being a confused, weak minded imbecile, and a blatant liar. Your ilk rarely backs up its rants with any quotes or facts. That requires intelligence and integrity. Thanks for proving my point, nut job... <chuckle> >> Look at some of the presentations on this website. The author is a >> physics teacher and presents the information very articulately. >> Let us know if you disagree with any of his research. It's been peer >> reviewed, and so far, no one has been able to find any errors. >> http://www.911speakout.org/ > I don't accept your premise. Do you disagree with any of the research on the website? If so, can you tell us what and why, exactly? -- "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org |