Greatly amused by...
in [UK Motorcycles]
|
From: Colin Irvine on 3 Dec 2009 14:35 On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 18:18:59 -0000, 'Hog squeezed out the following: >Colin Irvine wrote: >> On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 16:13:46 -0000, 'Hog squeezed out the following: >> >>> companies which think they can have rather obvious stuff >>> manufactured in China for �2-3 then sell them here for �90 >>> >>> www.mandp.co.uk/productinfo/583537/Workshop/Bike-Movers/Renntec?utm_source=email&utm_medium=031209&utm_campaign=031209 >>> >>> They can FRO >>> >>> I have enough fingers and toes to count how many they are likely to >>> sell. >> >> If I was pushed for space I'd have one. I think it looks neat. > >Yeah but you are the idle rich Well 1 out of 2's not bad. -- Colin Irvine ZZR1400 BOF#33 BONY#34 COFF#06 BHaLC#5 http://www.colinandpat.co.uk
From: Pip on 3 Dec 2009 14:45 In article <qt3gh553ec9cl9uub6f9agd8pt733m2v8b(a)4ax.com>, ginge says... > > On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 18:55:42 -0000, "'Hog" > <sm911SPAM(a)hotmailCHIPS.co.uk> wrote: > > >and frankly I wouldn't touch anything that involves having to sell to > >the retail public. > > Good job really because given your postings here are gradually > wobbling further and further towards borderline mental case I suspect > you'd not last long at it. Au contraire, my little ginger chum. From the tone of Hog's recent "non-troll" trolls and all the other nonsense, I'd think he'd be ideally suited. Checkout at B&Q, for example, always seems to be staffed by shouty window lickers. Hog would fit right in. -- Pip, the "Mechanical Nightmare" (tm Bonwick Major)
From: 'Hog on 3 Dec 2009 14:54 Champ wrote: > On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 20:11:31 +0100, doetnietcomputeren > <doesnotcompute(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'm starting to think that you're being deliberately obtuse. > > What, Hog? Never! Do you have an angle on this? -- 'Hog '06 ST4-S '96 Bastard12 '89 R100RS '81 XS650 '78 RD400 '81 R65 Outfit CO2-A load of hot air
From: 'Hog on 3 Dec 2009 14:56 Chas wrote: > "'Hog" <sm911SPAM(a)hotmailCHIPS.co.uk> > > >> and frankly I wouldn't touch anything that involves having to sell >> to the retail public. >> > > Good for you & I for one wish that we could all stick to your > principles. > Now please, if you will, in your own time, return everything you ever > bought from a retail outlet. All of it please, not just the good > things that keep you fed, clothed, warm etc. etc. etc. You also are suggesting I'm not a consumer. Which of course I am, in spades. And a tight one who likes a nice bargain. Of course when it comes to selling my goods and services I'm an utter hypocrite. -- 'Hog '06 ST4-S '96 Bastard12 '89 R100RS '81 XS650 '78 RD400 '81 R65 Outfit CO2-A load of hot air
From: ginge on 3 Dec 2009 14:56
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 19:45:57 -0000, Pip <gingerbloke(a)gmail.com> wrote: >In article <qt3gh553ec9cl9uub6f9agd8pt733m2v8b(a)4ax.com>, ginge says... >> >> On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 18:55:42 -0000, "'Hog" >> <sm911SPAM(a)hotmailCHIPS.co.uk> wrote: >> >> >and frankly I wouldn't touch anything that involves having to sell to >> >the retail public. >> >> Good job really because given your postings here are gradually >> wobbling further and further towards borderline mental case I suspect >> you'd not last long at it. > >Au contraire, my little ginger chum. From the tone of Hog's recent >"non-troll" trolls and all the other nonsense, I'd think he'd be ideally >suited. Checkout at B&Q, for example, always seems to be staffed by >shouty window lickers. Hog would fit right in. How odd, the B&Q till-trolls here are lovely individuals... tis a posh new B&Q, mind, wiv a coffee shop. Having said that....you've just made me think of an alternative.... Royal Mail Collection Office. And on that basis, damn, you're right. |