From: R. LaCasse on 9 Jul 2009 21:49 On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 15:32:26 -0600, "Bob Myers" <nospamplease(a)address.invalid> wrote: |>> Standard?? You're a dying breed, Bob. |> |>Aren't we all? |> Yeah I feel that way.. |>Actually, there's still a pretty fair number of bikes out there that |>satisfy my tastes; not everything coming out of Japan is wrapped |>up in unwanted plastic*, and there are definitely some tasty options A lot of Jap stuff is from Taiwan, and all the other mainland China that are called Red China... |>still coming out of England, Italy, and Germany too. So there |>MUST be a few others out there besides just me... |> They make a lot of good Jap Bike parts, plus a few good whole bikes, that don't change their design every year like the Cell Phone fads and hard/software systems. |> |>* What's unfortunate is the number of such Japanese models |>that, for whatever reason, never make it to these shores. That's a supply and demand "bulk Purchase" factor like all the made in China shipment policies, so they fall off the side because some aren't worth the 3-->12 month warranty. (Yamaha Majesty/Skyliner 400). Motor = Italy Minamelli/Motobi/Moytobi and affiliates something Metal Body/Frame= North industries Complex/Iron rice bowl Electronics = ECU/first and secondary ignition system is All Japanese Flexible plastics = Taiwan Hard plastics like headlight covers = All China factories. ASSEMBLY of ALL this stuff = Yamaha/MBK France.. Pre Mass Production Testing Motobi/Moytobi/Majesty/Skyliner 400/etc.... Exportation/Importation of the YProduct all Zionist Guvmint Borders plus DOT/CSA/ANSI standards approvals.
From: paul c on 9 Jul 2009 22:46 paul c wrote: .... > Well, I'd say Vito is right - the later CB750's, such as the 1982 > models, had twin cams and wasted spark. Any engine that doesn't have a > distributor driven off the camshaft or equivalent electronics wastes a > spark on the exhaust stroke, ... (talking about 4-stroke engines, not 2-strokes.)
From: Stephen Cowell on 10 Jul 2009 08:31 "Vito" <vito(a)cfl.rr.com> wrote .... > For many, chrome was better than daily polishing. Chrome is the optimal exhaust finish... it helps keep the temperature high on the way out the pipe; any cooling takes away from horsepower by reducing exhaust velocity and therefore aspiration. Black is the worst finish for exhaust, since it radiates heat fastest. Wrapped pipes solve this. __ Steve ..
From: R. LaCasse on 17 Jul 2009 19:32 On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:41:15 -0400, "Vito" <vito(a)cfl.rr.com> wrote: |>> valve job instead of simply rectifying the cdi/regulator of a single |>> fire... |> |>Your statement is still unclear. I've owned half a dozen Brit twins, 10 |>Harleys, 8 airhead BMWs and god knows how many Jap multi's that "wasted" |>sparks and not one ever needed a valve job because of it - nor have I ever |>heard of one that did. The extra spark happens when the effected cylinder |>is incapable of firing. The one exception is a Harley with its narrow V. |>If the engine is turning over slow enough, like when a weak battery or |>person is trying to start it, the extra spark *may* cause the motor to "kick |>back". But burn a valve? Never. That's right, I guess my "statement" was a bit unclear, although old Harleys still fire both plugs at once, and when your valves wear out, this causes backfiring, choking and sputtering. |>> |>> Or do you mean, you have 2 spark plugs per cylinder. which is about |>> as good an idea as the 4 valve cylinder... |>> |>No. 4+ valve cylinders are needed to get the most power out of a given |>displacement - like in a racing class. Otherwise cubic inches are cheaper. Your right, cubes are cheaper than xtra valves....
From: R. LaCasse on 17 Jul 2009 19:42 On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 02:18:16 GMT, paul c <toledobythesea(a)oohay.ac> wrote: |>Well, I'd say Vito is right - the later CB750's, such as the 1982 |>models, had twin cams and wasted spark. Any engine that doesn't have a |>distributor driven off the camshaft or equivalent electronics wastes a |>spark on the exhaust stroke, for that matter lots of modern cars waste |>spark. Number of cylinders doesn't matter and it's nothing to do with |>CDI, if the ignition pickup or exciter is driven by the crankkshaft, I |>don't see how to avoid a waste spark. The rectifier is mostly battery and primary regulated voltage, CDI is spark to "secondary" coil and the ("you say" ignition pickup or exciter) *Crankshaft Position TDC SENSOR* is timed by ECU/ECM....., am I right on that so far? Bob
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: V-Star Question Next: 2004 650 VStar Classic Won't Start |