Prev: Funny road signs
Next: Grrrr, sportbikes...
From: S'mee on 21 Jul 2010 23:09
On Jul 21, 2:06 pm, "Bob Myers" <nospample...(a)address.invalid> wrote:
> S'mee wrote:
> > On Jul 21, 11:19 am, Beam Me Up Scotty <Then-Destroy-
> > Everyth...(a)Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote:
> >> The whacked out.... all believe in faith, for the socialist wackos
> >> their faith/God is Marx, for Muslims its Mohammad, for others it's
> >> Christ and for atheist (who have no proof that God doesn't exist)
> >> and are also in a religion/faith they believe in. What they all have
> >> in common is that they all have a point that allows them to
> >> rationalize anything in the pursuit of their Utopia.
>
> > LOL you got one major screw up there...the muslims, the christians and
> > the Hebrews ALL believe in the same god, the god of abraham.
>
> At least one other "major screw up" besides that one.  Atheism is
> not truly a matter of faith, despite continued attempts on the parts of
> believers to paint it as such.  If not believing in a God or Gods is an
> example of faith, then the same could be set of not believing in Santa
> Claus, the Easter Bunny, or Bertrand Russell's famous "cosmic teapot."
> Or, as Richard Dawkins so nicely put it: "We're ALL atheists about
> most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in.  Some of us just
> go one god further."  You never require "proof" that a given entity
> does not exist; what is required is evidence that said entity DOES
> exist.  Otherwise, you should be accepting of ANY statements that
> say a given entity exists.  You would have to believe, simultaneously,
> in the Christian God, in Zeus, in Shiva, etc., simply because someone
> has made the claim that they exist.
>
> I am not, myself, quite an atheist per the classic meaning, by the way; I
> prefer Dawkins' "6th degree agnostic" description.  I cannot know
> for certain that there is no God, but I believe one (at least per most of
> the classic descriptions to be found in mainstream religions) to be
> unlikely in the extreme, and live my live on the assumption that there
> is in fact no such being per those descriptions.  I could also in some
> sense be properly described as a Buddhist, but that would then make
> sense only to those who understand that Buddhism is not, strictly
> speaking, a religion.
>
> Bob M.

Ah thankyou sirrah...I forget most people are not informed enough nor
smart enoguh to learn such things. I expect to much from the stupid
monkeys of our species.
From: Twibil on 22 Jul 2010 02:05
On Jul 21, 1:09 pm, The Starmaker <starma...(a)ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>
> California <used to be> a Latin American State. Then we stole it because there was a lot of gold.

(Corrected to reflect actual history.)
From: S'mee on 22 Jul 2010 11:20
On Jul 22, 12:05 am, Twibil <nowayjo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 21, 1:09 pm, The Starmaker <starma...(a)ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > California <used to be> a Latin American State. Then we stole it because there was a lot of gold.
>
> (Corrected to reflect actual history.)

Oh sure give him the cliff notes why don't you!
From: brad herschel on 22 Jul 2010 14:52
Is you family copulating with negroes?
From: Phxbrd on 22 Jul 2010 15:36

"brad herschel" <bradherschel(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6c1e6806-1a8d-4610-9517-ce6b62fcc082(a)s9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
> Is you family copulating with negroes?

Is you looking for your next 'encounter'?






First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Prev: Funny road signs
Next: Grrrr, sportbikes...