Petseal etc.
in [UK Motorcycles]
|
Prev: FOAK: Planning permission
Next: Planning permission
From: Oily on 8 Jun 2010 17:29 "Roper" wrote: Finally the best possible tank sealants on the planet are epoxy/ ceramic products developed for use in the petro-chemical industry, which are far more effective than costly DIY snake oil such as POR15 and Flowliner................... Any recommendations/suppliers?
From: SIRPip on 8 Jun 2010 18:00 Roper wrote: > Shame you dont seem to know what you are talking > about................ Shame you can't work out how to post to usenet in English, wankstain. -- SIRPip : B12
From: SIRPip on 8 Jun 2010 18:01 Oily wrote: > "Roper" wrote: > > Finally the best possible tank sealants on the planet are epoxy/ > ceramic products developed for use in the petro-chemical industry, > which are far more effective than costly DIY snake oil such as POR15 > and Flowliner................... > > Any recommendations/suppliers? Yeah - sort your quoting out, Oily. -- SIRPip : B12
From: Roper on 9 Jun 2010 03:29 On Jun 8, 10:35 pm, "Krusty" <dontwant...(a)nowhere.invalid> wrote: > Oily wrote: > > > "Roper" wrote: > > > Finally the best possible tank sealants on the planet are epoxy/ > > ceramic products developed for use in the petro-chemical industry, > > which are far more effective than costly DIY snake oil such as POR15 > > and Flowliner................... > > > Any recommendations/suppliers? > > Ignore him, it's kennyboi - quite possibly the most clueless person > ever to grace these groups. I'd trust Beav's opinion on Flowliner (not > used it meself), & POR15 certainly works perfectly. > > -- > Krusty > > '03 Tiger 955i '02 MV Senna '96 Tiger '79 Fantic Hiro 250 Anyone who would trust an idiot wittering on about silly DIY snake oil products, is perhaps in the market for a ticket for that bus ride on the moon!
From: Beav on 9 Jun 2010 08:15
"Roper" <ken59(a)live.co.uk> wrote in message news:b92049de-ad77-4e3e-b1d4->> >> I dunno, but I wouldn't be surprised. >> >> > or make an alloy tank for a MotoGP >> > bike, >> >> That's not restoration, idiot. >> >> > and in my mind those who suggest "restoration" is likely to >> > involve copious amounts of body filler, and bodging up fuel tanks with >> > silly DIY snake oil, are much mistaken >> >> I think this is where Beav ought to post links to all the photos he >> took of the restoration of my TS250ER bodywork, which detailed the >> work start to finish, and of which some appeared in a motorcycle >> magazine, whose staff were sufficiently impressed to run them. >> >> In short, he does it, and you, Kenny boi, have made a fool of yourself >> here before. So much so that you made it into the ukrmc FAQs. > > Anyone can pug up a dented tank with body filler.............. Someone once said that a trained monkey could paint too, but I haven't seen any of your work, so I can't really comment on the veracity of that statement. >but I > guess if he is "restoring" low end type bikes without much value, > there is no need for the type of skill required to make a new MotoGP > tank, And when did making a MotoGP tank become part of any restoration work? > which to al intents and purposes are the same as those required > to properly restore a badly damaged original part! Oh riiight! I get you now. -- Beav |