From: Oily on

"Wicked Uncle Nigel" wrote:
> >
> >"SIRPip" wrote:
> >
> >> Oily wrote:
> >>
> >> > "Roper" wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Finally the best possible tank sealants on the planet are epoxy/
> >> > ceramic products developed for use in the petro-chemical industry,
> >> > which are far more effective than costly DIY snake oil such as POR15
> >> > and Flowliner...................
> >> >
> >> > Any recommendations/suppliers?
> >>
> >> Yeah - sort your quoting out, Oily.
> >>
> >>
> >FFS, do you EVER come out with any useful comments?
>
> Frequently.
>
> You, by contrast...
>
Well, I didn't see anything wrong with asking an innocent question (the
first one); thought I was missing something. Apparently not.


From: Krusty on
Oily wrote:

>
> "Krusty" <dontwantany(a)nowhere.invalid> wrote in message
> >
> > It's not what you wrote, it's the fact that there weren't any '>' at
> > the start of the lines you left in of the message you replied to.
> > Which means nobody can tell which lines you wrote, & which you were
> > quoting.
> >
>
> > Ahh, thanks for that Krusty, I'm not as computer literate as you
> > lot. I
> thought that was
> > done automatically by Outlook Express, didn't know I had to put
> > them in. Is there some way to do this or do I have to put one in
> > at the beginning
> of each line?
> > Which is what I've done now, and has it worked?

Oh dear... What you've done there is put '>' in front of the lines
you've just typed - which is wrong. The software should automatically
put them in front of the lines of the message you're quoting - you
should never have to put them in manually. Your reply to Pip was fine
(>'s in front of his text & not in front of yours) so it might just be
OE screwing up. There is a bit of software called OE Quotefix which
apparently fixes some bugs with OE - might be worth finding that &
installing it. Or better yet, use a better usenet client - XanaNews is
excellent.

> > And what does the space--space do, I know it
> > needs
> deleting?

It's --space & it basically means everything that follows it is a
'signature' & should be deleted from any message you reply to. Again,
this is normally done automatically by the software.

--
Krusty
From: Oily on

"Krusty" wrote:

> Oily wrote:

> > > Which is what I've done now, and has it worked?
>
> Oh dear... What you've done there is put '>' in front of the lines
> you've just typed - which is wrong. The software should automatically
> put them in front of the lines of the message you're quoting - you
> should never have to put them in manually. Your reply to Pip was fine
> (>'s in front of his text & not in front of yours) so it might just be
> OE screwing up. There is a bit of software called OE Quotefix which
> apparently fixes some bugs with OE - might be worth finding that &
> installing it. Or better yet, use a better usenet client - XanaNews is
> excellent.
>

Ok, thanks. It may be as I'm using OE6. I'll have a word with number 2 son
who gives me these binary boxes to play with and get him to point me in the
right direction. Thanks for your patience.


From: Beav on


"Terh" <ken59(a)live.co.uk> wrote in message news:ce54904e-dcee-4fa1-89c6-

>> >and in my mind those who suggest "restoration" is likely to
>> > involve copious amounts of body filler, and bodging up fuel tanks with
>> > silly DIY snake oil, are much mistaken................
>>
>> I can see you really know all there is to know about bodywork, so I'll
>> leave
>> this argument totally defeated. Oh btw, have you got any pictures or
>> testaments of your own work you'd like to share?

>
>
>
> From your view of how to make an alloy tank you clearly dont have much
> of a clue of how to go about it, so I would suggest sticking to
> pugging up resto jobs with P38......................

So that's a "No" then. At least we've sorted that out.

btw, I don't think P38 is a good idea on an alloy tank, not when there's
milk available at very little cost. (You may need to think about that)

Now you can go about your business

--
Beav

From: TOG on
On 11 June, 10:51, "Beav" <beavis.origi...(a)ntlwoxorld.com> wrote:

> He's what's known as a "5 minute expert"


I've always preferred this definition of an expert:

An ex is a has-been and a spurt is a drip under pressure.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Prev: FOAK: Planning permission
Next: Planning permission