Prev: FOAK: Planning permission
Next: Planning permission
From: Oily on 9 Jun 2010 19:52 "Wicked Uncle Nigel" wrote: > > > >"SIRPip" wrote: > > > >> Oily wrote: > >> > >> > "Roper" wrote: > >> > > >> > Finally the best possible tank sealants on the planet are epoxy/ > >> > ceramic products developed for use in the petro-chemical industry, > >> > which are far more effective than costly DIY snake oil such as POR15 > >> > and Flowliner................... > >> > > >> > Any recommendations/suppliers? > >> > >> Yeah - sort your quoting out, Oily. > >> > >> > >FFS, do you EVER come out with any useful comments? > > Frequently. > > You, by contrast... > Well, I didn't see anything wrong with asking an innocent question (the first one); thought I was missing something. Apparently not.
From: Krusty on 10 Jun 2010 04:36 Oily wrote: > > "Krusty" <dontwantany(a)nowhere.invalid> wrote in message > > > > It's not what you wrote, it's the fact that there weren't any '>' at > > the start of the lines you left in of the message you replied to. > > Which means nobody can tell which lines you wrote, & which you were > > quoting. > > > > > Ahh, thanks for that Krusty, I'm not as computer literate as you > > lot. I > thought that was > > done automatically by Outlook Express, didn't know I had to put > > them in. Is there some way to do this or do I have to put one in > > at the beginning > of each line? > > Which is what I've done now, and has it worked? Oh dear... What you've done there is put '>' in front of the lines you've just typed - which is wrong. The software should automatically put them in front of the lines of the message you're quoting - you should never have to put them in manually. Your reply to Pip was fine (>'s in front of his text & not in front of yours) so it might just be OE screwing up. There is a bit of software called OE Quotefix which apparently fixes some bugs with OE - might be worth finding that & installing it. Or better yet, use a better usenet client - XanaNews is excellent. > > And what does the space--space do, I know it > > needs > deleting? It's --space & it basically means everything that follows it is a 'signature' & should be deleted from any message you reply to. Again, this is normally done automatically by the software. -- Krusty
From: Oily on 10 Jun 2010 05:18 "Krusty" wrote: > Oily wrote: > > > Which is what I've done now, and has it worked? > > Oh dear... What you've done there is put '>' in front of the lines > you've just typed - which is wrong. The software should automatically > put them in front of the lines of the message you're quoting - you > should never have to put them in manually. Your reply to Pip was fine > (>'s in front of his text & not in front of yours) so it might just be > OE screwing up. There is a bit of software called OE Quotefix which > apparently fixes some bugs with OE - might be worth finding that & > installing it. Or better yet, use a better usenet client - XanaNews is > excellent. > Ok, thanks. It may be as I'm using OE6. I'll have a word with number 2 son who gives me these binary boxes to play with and get him to point me in the right direction. Thanks for your patience.
From: Beav on 11 Jun 2010 06:19 "Terh" <ken59(a)live.co.uk> wrote in message news:ce54904e-dcee-4fa1-89c6- >> >and in my mind those who suggest "restoration" is likely to >> > involve copious amounts of body filler, and bodging up fuel tanks with >> > silly DIY snake oil, are much mistaken................ >> >> I can see you really know all there is to know about bodywork, so I'll >> leave >> this argument totally defeated. Oh btw, have you got any pictures or >> testaments of your own work you'd like to share? > > > > From your view of how to make an alloy tank you clearly dont have much > of a clue of how to go about it, so I would suggest sticking to > pugging up resto jobs with P38...................... So that's a "No" then. At least we've sorted that out. btw, I don't think P38 is a good idea on an alloy tank, not when there's milk available at very little cost. (You may need to think about that) Now you can go about your business -- Beav
From: TOG on 11 Jun 2010 06:49
On 11 June, 10:51, "Beav" <beavis.origi...(a)ntlwoxorld.com> wrote: > He's what's known as a "5 minute expert" I've always preferred this definition of an expert: An ex is a has-been and a spurt is a drip under pressure. |