From: Greg.Procter on
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:06:28 +1300, The Older Gentleman
<totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> 1949 Whizzer <macmiled(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sure. You could install shorter stanchion tubes, shorter springs and
>> maybe even shorten the damper rods.
>
> Or you could do what I suggest, which is raise them through the yokes.
> As long as you don't mind maybe a couple of inches of stanchion poking
> up.
>

Can't do it - the body/front skirt surrounds the head.
From: Greg.Procter on
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 01:50:13 +1300, 1949 Whizzer <macmiled(a)gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Oct 11, 9:06�pm, totallydeadmail...(a)yahoo.co.uk (Looking for an
> Argument, Neil Murray) wrote:
>
>> Or you could do what I suggest, which is raise them through the yokes.
>> As long as you don't mind maybe a couple of inches of stanchion poking
>> up.
>
> I don't feel like instructing Greg about the importance of matching
> the front spring rate(s) to the rear spring rates and why that's
> important to the overall ride comforts as well as traction balance.
>
> And, if he found a set of forks for a more modern motorcycle which
> used a 17-inch front wheel, he would still have a handling problem
> because the rear wheel is probably a 12 or 14-incher.
>
> The rider of a two wheeled vehicle with such a wheel/tire diameter
> mismatch feels like the bike doesn't "want" to turn into a corner and
> then it feels like the rear end is falling out from under him is the
> turn.
>

Let's put it this way - I started tuning bikes in the mid 60s,
started building frames and engines in the late 1960s. Racing bikes
1969. (eyesight not up to racing speeds so I retreated to building/tuning)
End of 1970s m/c accident ended m/c career.
1990s worked with John Britten on engine concepts.

I can design a motor, I can design a frame.
I don't know the current and recent motorcycles.
I don't have deep pockets.
Have lathes and mills, CNC and conventional.

Regards,
Greg.P.
From: Greg.Procter on
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 04:34:09 +1300, The Older Gentleman
<totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> 1949 Whizzer <macmiled(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> And, if he found a set of forks for a more modern motorcycle which
>> used a 17-inch front wheel,
>
> Who said he would?
>

Adapting "X" axle and wheel to "Y" forks is no problem.
I could equally design completely new forks and machine them,
but if existing forks could be shortened it would cut costs drastically.
From: Greg.Procter on
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:23:09 +1300, The Older Gentleman
<totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> Schiffner <stevenkeith2(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Oct 11, 10:06 pm, totallydeadmail...(a)yahoo.co.uk (The Older
>> Gentleman) wrote:
>> > 1949 Whizzer <macmi...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > Sure. You could install shorter stanchion tubes, shorter springs and
>> > > maybe even shorten the damper rods.
>> >
>> > Or you could do what I suggest, which is raise them through the yokes.
>> > As long as you don't mind maybe a couple of inches of stanchion poking
>> > up.
>>
>> uh, dude your senility is creeping in methinks...he's talking about a
>> motor-scooter.
>
> My bad for not reading the post properly. That said, grafting a
> conventional front fork end on wouldn't be hard: just a waste of effort.
>

I don't mind wasting effort - retired with more sense than money :-)
From: little man upon the stair on
On Oct 22, 7:03 pm, "Greg.Procter" <proc...(a)ihug.co.nz> wrote:

> Haven't bought it yet - have put in an auction bid though.

In that case, don't buy it, look for something that does what you want
without
having to make major modifications.

Personally, I was thinking about buying a 3-wheeled bicycle and adding
a 49cc moped motor to it if I ever deteriorate to the point where I
can no longer balance a 2-wheeler...