What goes through your head
in [Motorcycles]
|
Prev: Spring Ride Report: TehachapI Pass & Environs.
Next: 9-11 Truth makes HUGE showing at Los Angeles Peace March
From: MikeWhy on 5 May 2010 07:44 S'mee wrote: > On May 4, 2:52 pm, "MikeWhy" <boat042-nos...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> S'mee wrote: >>> On May 4, 10:15 am, "MikeWhy" <boat042-nos...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>> S'mee wrote: >>>>> On May 3, 10:55 pm, "MikeWhy" <boat042-nos...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>> Twibil wrote: >>>>>>> Might prove useful should you ever find yourself trapped in a >>>>>>> freshman physics class and have to sing your way out. >> >>>>>> Not to be a curmudgeon, but ye've misspelt "chemistry". >> >>>>> Your point being? You constantly mispeil Y as why...nobody gets on >>>>> ur kase aboot it. >> >>>> This is so third grade, Schiffner. Wouldn't you say? Mention that >>>> to Pete when you s'im, won't you? >> >>> humourless git arenn't you... >> >> Humor lies with the beholder, Mr. Kettle. I missed 2 days of >> workouts, after overextending myself Saturday. > > huh, when I still thought structured exercise was the way to > go...overextending never stopped me. I might have gone lighter or > spent more time on stretching but that was it. Then again I worked out > regardless of serious injuries also...7 days of 2 to 6mile runs with > an hours worth work out. In spite of a displace pelvis. So you get no > sympathy, nothing personal I just got no sympathy for whinning about > "it hurts" or "I strained somethign" hmmph. The left knee all but collapsed while I was walking afterward. It wasn't the pain that bothered me, but the distinct possibility that I would be sidelined for a month or more while it healed. It's been 30 years since I had been on a pedal bike. Four weeks ago, I bought a "cheap" hybrid for myself when I bought one for the Mrs. and her daily exercise. Saturday, I installed clipless pedals, and rode 35 miles. That's a bit more distance than I had ridden in more than a quarter century, and I wasn't sure if it was the cleat adjustment and tendon injury, or just newly recruited muscles screaming their agony. (It turned out to be the latter. The pain was gone already by Saturday night, but the message was clear. Take it a bit easy for a while.) UPS says my new bike will be here later today, all 17 lbs of fury. I might be nuts, but I just signed up for 150 miles in 3 days with the lung association, 5 weeks from now. I think I'll be ready. > > >> That's as cheery at 10:00 AM as you'll get >> from me until that's set right. > > at least you are honest about it...though frankly unless you need a > doctor or a physical therapist I don't see what the problem is. Akshually, all I needed was a mouth hug. All's well now. > >> What's your excuse? > > I had a reason...you are making excuses. Heh. ;)
From: MikeWhy on 5 May 2010 09:05 Twibil wrote: > On May 4, 4:33 pm, "MikeWhy" <boat042-nos...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >> That really is pathetic, Pete. Give it up already, will ya? You have >> it so completely bass ackwards, and it only makes it that much more >> obvious you don't understand the first thing about what you just >> posted. > > Mike, you're an idiot. I don't know or care *why* you choose to > behave like an idiot, but your repeated actions have demonstrated the > fact that you *do; over and over. > > First time I recall seeing you post was several years ago when > Timberwoof said that he didn't understand why a bike had to lean > further and further to the inside of a turn as the gee force pulling > it to the outside increased, and I tried to provide an explanation for > him in non-technical terms. The elements song lyrics go with freshman chemistry, not freshman physics. Just say so, and all will be well. > > You immediately posted an accusation that I was spouting bullshit, and > when you found out that I was actually a retired track instructor you > said instead that I wasn't managing to explain things in a manner that > you thought appropriate. > > When I challenged you to do a better job, you replied that it wasn't > your job to do so but that *I* sure couldn't do it. > > Next you tried to start another flame war because you claimed that > some rocks I'd described weren't big enough to be "boulders" according > to you. The fact that the word "boulder" doesn't come with specs > attached didn't keep you from trying to fan the argument with BS about > the density of granite, yadda yadda yadda. > > A couple of years later you jumped onto something I'd said in a thread > about cornering -again claiming that I was spouting BS- and when again > confronted with my background as a track instructor you said something > like "I have no way of knowing your background": which demonstrates > that you were either lying through your teeth or that you'd actually > forgotton what had passed between us before. > > And now you're doing your level and none-too-competent best to do the > same thing all over again: try to start a flame war over something > that's essentially meaningless: this time because you claim I confused > Chemestry and Physics. > > *I* didn't confuse the two. > > But *you* seem to have confused me with someone over whom you've been > appointed to stand in eternal judgement. > > Again: I don't know or care *why* you choose to behave like an idiot, > but your repeated actions have demonstrated the fact that you *do*; > and have done so over and over. Pete, believe me when I say there's nothing personal here. Your perception of eternal judgement and recounting of our posting history overlooks your role, the utterance of stupidity that begged correction. It's a service I give freely to everyone, without favoritism. I'll grant that circumstances have often found you on the other end. That's your doing, not mine. As for starting a flame war over physics and chemistry, I did no such thing. I posted a correction as gentle as I know how. The rest is all you.
From: Henry on 5 May 2010 09:37 MikeWhy wrote: > Twitbull fumed frothed and ranted: >> Mike, you're an idiot. I don't know or care *why* you choose to >> behave like an idiot, but your repeated actions have demonstrated the >> fact that you *do; over and over. > The elements song lyrics go with freshman chemistry, not freshman > physics. Just say so, and all will be well. That would require twitbull to show a trace of integrity and honesty. He's far more likely to run and hide behind his killfile and spew moronic lies about your mother and/or what he "thinks" you do for a living. About all one can do for twitbull is show some pity. Using logic or reasoning with him has proved to be a waste of time and effort... -- "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: S'mee on 5 May 2010 13:05 On May 5, 10:55 am, "MikeWhy" <boat042-nos...(a)yahoo.com> wrote SNIP > I'm a wimp. Physical pain stops the world for me. ;) Cher: Get over it! 8^)
From: Bob Myers on 5 May 2010 14:07
On 5/5/2010 7:05 AM, MikeWhy wrote: > > The elements song lyrics go with freshman chemistry, not freshman > physics. Just say so, and all will be well. > Oh, fer Cthulhu's sake! Who CARES????? All is well ALREADY! What are you, the regional sales director for Pedants 'R' Us? Bob M. |