With regard to the "Rage Against The Machine for Christmas Number One" campaign
in [UK Motorcycles]
|
From: M J Carley on 17 Dec 2009 11:03 In the referenced article, Pete Fisher <Peter(a)ps-fisher.demon.co.uk> writes: >And my nomination is: >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXCEdrnaFlY I see your folkie guitarist and raise you a gravel-voiced demi god: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVs6X9yIM_k -- Si deve tornare alle basi: Marx ed i Clash. Michael Carley: http://people.bath.ac.uk/ensmjc/
From: Krusty on 17 Dec 2009 11:19 M J Carley wrote: > In the referenced article, Pete Fisher <Peter(a)ps-fisher.demon.co.uk> > writes: > > > And my nomination is: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXCEdrnaFlY > > I see your folkie guitarist and raise you a gravel-voiced demi god: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVs6X9yIM_k My vote's for http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KTsXHXMkJA -- Krusty '03 Tiger 955i '02 MV Senna '96 Tiger (for sale) '79 Fantic Hiro 250 (for sale) '81 Corvette (for sale)
From: Wicked Uncle Nigel on 17 Dec 2009 11:17 Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, Champ <news(a)champ.org.uk> typed >On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:46:11 +0000, Wicked Uncle Nigel ><wun(a)wicked-uncle-nigel.me.uk> wrote: > >>>>>>>>Let's just agree that you're wrong, OK? >>>>> >>>>>>>Isn't it your turn? >>>>> >>>>>>No, I'm pretty sure it's you for all of December. Hang on, I'll check >>>>>>with F... >>>>> >>>>>I'll get Mrs WUN to confirm... >>>> >>>>What we have here, is a Mexican stand-off. >>> >>>You're both in the wrong and you know it. Now go make amends in some >>>way. > >>Well, I think Champ and I may have finally found a point of agreement >>here! > >Well, I shall be bringing F a large Toblerone back from Switzerland >after this weekend. What will you be doing, eh? Jewellery. -- Wicked Uncle Nigel - "He's hopeless, but he's honest" can you see the light of need shinin' in my eye?
From: Champ on 17 Dec 2009 11:29 On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:17:38 +0000, Wicked Uncle Nigel <wun(a)wicked-uncle-nigel.me.uk> wrote: >>>>You're both in the wrong and you know it. Now go make amends in some >>>>way. >> >>>Well, I think Champ and I may have finally found a point of agreement >>>here! >> >>Well, I shall be bringing F a large Toblerone back from Switzerland >>after this weekend. What will you be doing, eh? >Jewellery. <folds> Actually, the jewelery will be purchased next week. -- Champ We declare that the splendor of the world has been enriched by a new beauty: the beauty of speed. ZX10R | Hayabusa | GPz750turbo neal at champ dot org dot uk
From: ogden on 17 Dec 2009 12:22
Ben wrote: > On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:39:46 -0000, ogden <ogden(a)pre.org> wrote: > > >Krusty wrote: > >> Champ wrote: > >> > >> > On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:33:15 -0000, ogden <ogden(a)pre.org> wrote: > >> > > >> > >> 29p at amazon. > >> > > > >> > > *bzzt* > >> > > > >> > > Minimum price for a digital audio track to be eligible for the > >> > > chart is 40p. > >> > > >> > Oh. > >> > > >> > There was something on the Facebook group saying the Amazon 29p > >> > downloads were eligible. > >> > >> I believe they are, there was supposedly something on Amazon's site > >> about it. > > > >Reference? > > > >> The 40p relates to a 'different' price, not the price punters > >> pay. > > > >Sounds unlikely. > > > >"Digital Minimum Dealer Price £0.40p : Only tracks with a minimum PPD of > >40 pence or more shall be eligible for the Official Singles Chart. > > Yeah, the 40p is the price the dealer pays, not what they sell it for. > So Amazon have bought those singles at more than 40p and are selling > them for a loss apparently. No, 32p is the minimum price the dealer pays (see other post or link posted earlier). 40p is the retail price per download. The loophole allowing the price to be below 40p is meant to be for subscription-based sales models but Amazon seem to be using it as a loss-leader. -- ogden |