From: ginge on
On Tue, 11 May 2010 22:12:23 +0100, "Hog"
<sm911SPAM(a)CHIPShotmail.co.uk> wrote:

>Champ <news(a)champ.org.uk> wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 May 2010 21:45:37 +0100, "Hog"
>> <sm911SPAM(a)CHIPShotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>> and failure to note the context of the post there
>>
>> And what context was that, then?
>
>Kenny Everett >< Benny Hill
>
>Rough humour is a two way street and we like it that way.
>
>I'm quite sure PC knows I don't have the slightest issue with him and found
>him a perfectly charming fellow in person. And nobody could ever imagine
>that I have reservations about other folks "preferences".

You appear to have enough reservation to want to write preferences in
quotes.

Just sayin'.
From: Hog on
ginge <the.gingeREMOVE(a)THISgmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 22:12:23 +0100, "Hog"
> <sm911SPAM(a)CHIPShotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Champ <news(a)champ.org.uk> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 11 May 2010 21:45:37 +0100, "Hog"
>>> <sm911SPAM(a)CHIPShotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>>> and failure to note the context of the post there
>>>
>>> And what context was that, then?
>>
>> Kenny Everett >< Benny Hill
>>
>> Rough humour is a two way street and we like it that way.
>>
>> I'm quite sure PC knows I don't have the slightest issue with him
>> and found him a perfectly charming fellow in person. And nobody
>> could ever imagine that I have reservations about other folks
>> "preferences".
>
> You appear to have enough reservation to want to write preferences in
> quotes.
>
> Just sayin'.

No need to be silly. Some of UKRM's denziens *have* been eye openers. PC is
hardly one of them.

--
Hog


From: darsy on
On Tue, 11 May 2010 22:51:38 +0100, Andy Bonwick
<nospam(a)bonwick.me.uk> wrote:

>On Tue, 11 May 2010 22:24:06 +0100, "Hog"
><sm911SPAM(a)CHIPShotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>The day rough humour and having a good natured pop becomes a one way street
>>I'll still go up the wrong way.
>>
>The problem here is that your comment didn't come across to anyone as
>being good natured.

at the risk of being tarred and feathered for going against the grain
here, Hog's original comment that has generated so much bile was - to
me - an obviously sarcastic reductio ad absurdum argument aimed at
suggesting how off-the-mark he felt PC's comparison of him to Kenny
was, contrasting a stereotype with another.

But, hey, maybe it's just me.

--
d.
From: Scraggy on
darsy <darsy(a)sticky.co.uk> wrote:

> at the risk of being tarred and feathered for going against the grain
> here, Hog's original comment that has generated so much bile was - to
> me - an obviously sarcastic reductio ad absurdum argument aimed at
> suggesting how off-the-mark he felt PC's comparison of him to Kenny
> was, contrasting a stereotype with another.
>
> But, hey, maybe it's just me.

No, it's not just you.

--
I don't care to belong to a club that accepts people like me as
members. Groucho Marx


From: Champ on
On Wed, 12 May 2010 06:30:58 +0100, darsy <darsy(a)sticky.co.uk> wrote:

>at the risk of being tarred and feathered for going against the grain
>here, Hog's original comment that has generated so much bile was - to
>me - an obviously sarcastic reductio ad absurdum argument aimed at
>suggesting how off-the-mark he felt PC's comparison of him to Kenny
>was, contrasting a stereotype with another.

To a point. The difference, for me, was that PC's comparison wasn't
in anyway personally insulting, whereas Hog's response very much was.
--
Champ
We declare that the splendour of the world has been enriched by a new beauty: the beauty of speed.
ZX10R | Hayabusa | GPz750turbo
neal at champ dot org dot uk