From: vulgarandmischevious on 24 Dec 2009 14:12 JackH <jackhackettuk(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >You can pick up houses in certain, all but derelict, suburbs of >Detroit for $10 at the moment. > >Admittedly they tend to be burned out and stripped of anything of >worth such as pipework etc... and I'm sure the legal paperwork etc >involved in buy it will bump the cost up by several grand, but it's >still ridiculously cheap. Perfectly habitable places are available for 5 grand.
From: JackH on 24 Dec 2009 14:17 On Dec 24, 7:12 pm, vulgarandmischevious <vulgarandmischevi...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > JackH <jackhacket...(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > >You can pick up houses in certain, all but derelict, suburbs of > >Detroit for $10 at the moment. > > >Admittedly they tend to be burned out and stripped of anything of > >worth such as pipework etc... and I'm sure the legal paperwork etc > >involved in buy it will bump the cost up by several grand, but it's > >still ridiculously cheap. > > Perfectly habitable places are available for 5 grand. Amazing, isn't it? I know they tend to be in not particularly pleasant areas, but they're still a house you can own outright. I read another article the other day which outlined how the average annual wage in one state was something like $4.5k. Not exactly the imagery most have of the States, is it. -- JackH
From: vulgarandmischevious on 24 Dec 2009 14:22 JackH <jackhackettuk(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >I read another article the other day which outlined how the average >annual wage in one state was something like $4.5k. Can't be. Federal minimum wage is more than that. Unless they count annual earnings of part-time workers without normalizing for the hours they work.
From: JackH on 24 Dec 2009 14:29 On Dec 24, 7:22 pm, vulgarandmischevious <vulgarandmischevi...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > JackH <jackhacket...(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > >I read another article the other day which outlined how the average > >annual wage in one state was something like $4.5k. > > Can't be. Federal minimum wage is more than that. Unless they count > annual earnings of part-time workers without normalizing for the hours > they work. I'll try and dig out the article - it wouldn't be the first time I've spouted bollocks around these parts, but pretty sure that's what it alluded to. Bear with me... -- JackH
From: The Older Gentleman on 24 Dec 2009 14:42
SteveH <italiancar(a)gmail.com> wrote: > The Older Gentleman <totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > > SteveH <italiancar(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > What worries me, though, is that if it's stood outside, the storage may > > > do more damage than the pikeys did to it. > > > > I'd be more worried about the storage charges over the Christmas period. > > > > Biggest scam going, storage charges. A little bit of damage, storage at > > �x a day +_VAT, and they write off the bike and the storage company gets > > another cheap motorcycle. > > Already cleared this one with plod - I won't be charged for storage. Blimey. How did you work that one? Worth knowing, just in case, etc etc. -- BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F Triumph Street Triple Suzuki TS250ER GN250 Damn, back to six bikes! Try Googling before asking a damn silly question. chateau dot murray at idnet dot com |