HDR Hell
in [UK Motorcycles]
|
Prev: Handle bar engine kill switch or ignition key switch to stop bike?
Next: Specific clock type required
From: CT on 20 Oct 2009 05:14 Champ wrote: > On 20 Oct 2009 08:41:45 GMT, "CT" <me(a)christrollen.co.uk> wrote: > > > So it's not a photograph then. > > See Vass's post - sounds like it can be generated from a single source > image. Which it would have to be with any moving subject matter, like > the runners. OK, but I really do think it is important that the viewer is made aware. And for my (hypothetical) CT's Photography Competition 2009 I'd categorise entries thus: 1. Single frame, no post-processing. 2. Single frame, post-processing allowed. 2. Multiple frame (max. 3), post-processing allowed. 3. Open category - anything goes. And maybe 4. Film :o) -- Chris
From: Veggie Dave on 20 Oct 2009 05:13 Grimly Curmudgeon <grimly4REMOVE(a)REMOVEgmail.com> wrote the following literary masterpiece: >Holy shite. What a mess. <Grumpy Old Man>What happened to the good ol' days where you exposed for the shadows and printed for the highlights? Proper photography!</GOM> -- Veggie Dave http://www.iq18films.co.uk "To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin." Cardinal Bellarmine
From: Jim on 20 Oct 2009 05:37 spike1(a)freenet.co.uk wrote: >> but the >> article doesn't really tell me how it's achieved - there's lots of >> references to multiple images, which I'm sure weren't used here >> (certainly not in the case of the runners). > > If you take a raw image, you can do some HDR tricks without taking multiple > images apparently. Not entirely sure how though. There's no particular trick to it. It's just that if you make the light bits darker and the dark bits lighter you have more bits available to show details. It's a bit like the way NICAM compression works. The camera won't do this by default because it looks so bloody odd.
From: Vass on 20 Oct 2009 05:43 "Grimly Curmudgeon" <grimly4REMOVE(a)REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message news:675qd5dd1j3ubvee38vhutl414ffr65l4p(a)4ax.com... > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/8314105.stm > Holy shite. What a mess. oh what the hell, in for a penny... may favourite of my HDR''s to date http://www.flickr.com/photos/canon-eos/3033008862/sizes/l/ (I'll stop now) -- Vass
From: Jim on 20 Oct 2009 05:43
CT wrote: > And for my (hypothetical) CT's Photography Competition 2009 I'd > categorise entries thus: > > 1. Single frame, no post-processing. > 2. Single frame, post-processing allowed. > 2. Multiple frame (max. 3), post-processing allowed. > 3. Open category - anything goes. > And maybe 4. Film :o) I think that's problematic, in that if you don't allow any post-processing the metering on modern cameras is so good that pretty much anyone who is in the right place at the right time can take a winning picture - where's the skill gone? where is the art? |