HDR Hell
in [UK Motorcycles]
|
Prev: Handle bar engine kill switch or ignition key switch to stop bike?
Next: Specific clock type required
From: YTC#1 on 20 Oct 2009 12:44 Grimly Curmudgeon wrote: > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/8314105.stm > Holy shite. What a mess. They all looked so much nicer in the Gruaniad yesterday -- Bruce Porter XJR1300SP, XJ900F, GSX750W, GSX250, Pegaso 650 Trail POTM#1(KoTL), WUSS#1 , YTC#1(bar), OSOS#2(KoTL) , DS#3 , IbW#18 ,Apostle#8 "The internet is a huge and diverse community and not every one is friendly" http://www.ytc1.co.uk There *is* an alternative! http://www.openoffice.org/
From: Ace on 21 Oct 2009 08:55 On 20 Oct 2009 09:14:00 GMT, "CT" <me(a)christrollen.co.uk> wrote: >OK, but I really do think it is important that the viewer is made aware. Why?
From: CT on 21 Oct 2009 09:04 Ace wrote: > On 20 Oct 2009 09:14:00 GMT, "CT" <me(a)christrollen.co.uk> wrote: > > > OK, but I really do think it is important that the viewer is made > > aware. > > Why? See my reply to Switters. -- Chris
From: Beav on 21 Oct 2009 09:29 "Switters" <me(a)privacy.net> wrote in message news:Xns9CAA99B4EE90swittersnospam(a)188.40.43.213... > On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:38:00 GMT, Beav wrote: > >> The trouble is, you go to that place because the picture of it looked >> good, then you discover it doesn't look anything like the picture, so >> you end up disappointed. > > Which is true of many a landscape photo going back over the years. Indeed, but even back on "the old days", processing was taking place in the darkroom. I've got nothing against processed pictures as it takes the whole photography thing from something other than a snapshot of a split second into an art form of its own. Great for those who are photographers or lovers of dramatic pictures, but a little (I hate to say misleading, but that's the only word I can think of right now so...) misleading to those who are attracted to places shown in photo's. Granted these photo's are usually designed to attract people to places (advertisements an' all that) but there are some out there, me included, who never realised the extent to which some photo's have been tweaked. I'd never heard of HDR for a start. I've *seen* pictures that I now know have been "HDR-ed" but I thought that the photographer had spent time lighting a scene and then clicking the button, not clicking the button then generating something later on the computer. Still very interesting mind. -- Beav VN 750 Zed 1000 OMF# 19
From: Ace on 21 Oct 2009 09:43
On 21 Oct 2009 13:04:39 GMT, "CT" <me(a)christrollen.co.uk> wrote: >Ace wrote: > >> On 20 Oct 2009 09:14:00 GMT, "CT" <me(a)christrollen.co.uk> wrote: >> >> > OK, but I really do think it is important that the viewer is made >> > aware. >> >> Why? > >See my reply to Switters. <reads> Still doesn't really answer the question. _You_ may want to know, but I can't work out in what way it would be 'important'. It's only a picture, FFS. |