If you go down to the woods today
in [Motorcycles]
|
Prev: 419's are HOOT!!!
Next: Packing an equalizer
From: Sean_Q_ on 1 Nov 2009 23:28 Datesfat Chicks wrote: >> What an utter tosspot. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tosspot > > http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tosspot Thanks for clearing that up Dates. It seems to be Brit slang with a number of possible meanings, none of them complimentary. SQ
From: don (Calgary) on 1 Nov 2009 23:39 On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 22:22:00 -0600, Chuck Rhode <CRhode(a)LacusVeris.com> wrote: >On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:05:02 +0000, don (Calgary) wrote: > >> Personally I would much rather encounter a coyote than a loose dog. > >... and run the risk of rabies. Well rabies is not a big problem around here, so there is little risk there. Then factor in the probability of being attacked by a coyote is minimal and I would still rather encounter a coyote than a loose dog.
From: The Older Gentleman on 2 Nov 2009 02:16 don (Calgary) <hd.flhr(a)telus.net> wrote: > On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 21:40:54 +0000, totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk (The > Older Gentleman) wrote: > > > > >Dang, but I've never forgotten that. taught me something, too. Can't > >remember what, but it was important. And I learned something. > >Definitely. > > What an utter tosspot. C&P again. What *is* your problem? A woman called Mitchell gets mauled by a coyote. I post a reference to a woman called Mitchell, quoting the opening lines of her famous song called Coyote. And you miss the ref by a country mile. To be fair, you're not the only one, although Clarke says the song isn't widely known in Leftpondia[1]. And she's even Canadian. But you see a chance to snipe. Even *after* it's been explained. And then get all snarly when parody, which you seem fond of, is nicely demonstrated. What a nasty inadequate little mammal you can be. I know it's not your default state, though. [1] More a case of "I've not heard of it", I fear. -- BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F Triumph Street Triple Suzuki TS250ER (currently Beaving) Damn, back to five bikes! Try Googling before asking a damn silly question. chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
From: Vito on 2 Nov 2009 07:40 "J. Clarke" <jclarke.usenet(a)cox.net> wrote | So let's see, someone looking at the grave of their parents a half a mile | from Harvard is supposed to go armed and exercise situational awareness due | to the danger of coyote attack? With all due respect, yes! Coyotes are not the only vicious predators in and around the area. I am armed and 'exercise situational awareness'. | | Sorry, but if you think that that is the case you simply do not understand | the problem. | Perhaps. Please elaborate. The only reason I can see that one would not be armed is that there is no danger. Is there absolutely no danger of predator attack in the area? No viscious dogs? No criminals?
From: don (Calgary) on 2 Nov 2009 18:37
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 07:16:44 +0000, totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk (The Older Gentleman) wrote: >don (Calgary) <hd.flhr(a)telus.net> wrote: > >> On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 21:40:54 +0000, totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk (The >> Older Gentleman) wrote: >> >> > >> >Dang, but I've never forgotten that. taught me something, too. Can't >> >remember what, but it was important. And I learned something. >> >Definitely. >> >> What an utter tosspot. > >C&P again. > >What *is* your problem? > >A woman called Mitchell gets mauled by a coyote. I post a reference to a >woman called Mitchell, quoting the opening lines of her famous song >called Coyote. > >And you miss the ref by a country mile. To be fair, you're not the only >one, although Clarke says the song isn't widely known in Leftpondia[1]. > >And she's even Canadian. > >But you see a chance to snipe. Even *after* it's been explained. >And then get all snarly when parody, which you seem fond of, is nicely >demonstrated. > >What a nasty inadequate little mammal you can be. I know it's not your >default state, though. > > >[1] More a case of "I've not heard of it", I fear. Actually all I did was point out you are an ankle biter, after you were nipping at the ankles of the OP. It was an honest and accurate assessment. You responded with some kind of a disjointed unrelated story, to which I replied "What and utter Tosspot" or something like that. You seem to have assumed I was talking about you. Strange you would jump to that conclusion. |