From: tomorrow on
On May 29, 3:56 am, "TMack"
> BTW - have you ever heard the saying "when you are in a deep hole its best
> to stop digging"?  Currently you appear to be sinking ever-deeper at a rapid
> rate.


He's been at it for years, plumbing new, heretofore unheard-of usenet
depths.

From: Vito on
TMack wrote:
>> ? wrote:
>>> On May 28, 10:07 am, "TMack"
>>> <tonyREMOVECAPSmac...(a)REMOVECAPS.dsl.pipex.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Lets be clear - we are talking about bhp at the at the back wheel.
>>>
>>> No, YOU are talking about rear wheel horsepower.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Getting
>>>> back to where this started: "degreeing the cams" (whatever that is
>>>> supposed to mean) is not going to turn a 29 bhp stock bike into 50
>>>> bhp.
>>>
>>> I said 47 horsepower, not 50.
>>>
>>> If you don't understand by now how camshaft degreeing affects power
>>> delivery, you haven't done any serious performance modifications.
>>
>> If you are referring to the process of ensuring that the cam is
>> exactly in the right position, that will only optimise an engine in
>> its existing configuration. Given that nobody has EVER got more
>> than 29 bhp out of a stock S40 I fail to see how additional
>> precision in cam alignment is going to magically deliver another 21
>> bhp. Even a performance cam will only provide a small improvement
>> in that engine. People have tried a variety of different grinds on
>> the S40 cam but none have achieved more than a relatively small
>> improvement in horsepower - certainly not another 21 bhp.
>>
>> Again - stop the bullshit. Give us ONE proven example of an S40
>> engine delivering more than 45bhp at the back wheel.
>>

The whole arguement is a joke as one cannot get any real HP from any engine
needing a cam except by making the displacement 2 or 3x bigger.