From: tomorrow on 30 May 2010 12:51 On May 29, 3:56 am, "TMack" > BTW - have you ever heard the saying "when you are in a deep hole its best > to stop digging"? Currently you appear to be sinking ever-deeper at a rapid > rate. He's been at it for years, plumbing new, heretofore unheard-of usenet depths.
From: Vito on 30 May 2010 15:06 TMack wrote: >> ? wrote: >>> On May 28, 10:07 am, "TMack" >>> <tonyREMOVECAPSmac...(a)REMOVECAPS.dsl.pipex.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Lets be clear - we are talking about bhp at the at the back wheel. >>> >>> No, YOU are talking about rear wheel horsepower. >>> >>> >>>> Getting >>>> back to where this started: "degreeing the cams" (whatever that is >>>> supposed to mean) is not going to turn a 29 bhp stock bike into 50 >>>> bhp. >>> >>> I said 47 horsepower, not 50. >>> >>> If you don't understand by now how camshaft degreeing affects power >>> delivery, you haven't done any serious performance modifications. >> >> If you are referring to the process of ensuring that the cam is >> exactly in the right position, that will only optimise an engine in >> its existing configuration. Given that nobody has EVER got more >> than 29 bhp out of a stock S40 I fail to see how additional >> precision in cam alignment is going to magically deliver another 21 >> bhp. Even a performance cam will only provide a small improvement >> in that engine. People have tried a variety of different grinds on >> the S40 cam but none have achieved more than a relatively small >> improvement in horsepower - certainly not another 21 bhp. >> >> Again - stop the bullshit. Give us ONE proven example of an S40 >> engine delivering more than 45bhp at the back wheel. >> The whole arguement is a joke as one cannot get any real HP from any engine needing a cam except by making the displacement 2 or 3x bigger.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: Still deprived of sports bikes :-( Next: 9/11 was an inside job. |