UKRM Run 2010
in [UK Motorcycles]
|
From: CT on 4 May 2010 04:39 Wicked Uncle Nigel wrote: > The GTR is distressingly thirsty when pressing on. I filled up near > St Quentin, and got the low fuel light as I approached the port. Try riding with two Ducatis. Fill up, thrash 60 miles up the Autoroute at "interesting" speeds and then stop to fill up again! -- Chris
From: CT on 4 May 2010 04:42 Cab wrote: > Looking forward to next year's trip, although this may be Colin doing > the DFV'ing as he volunteered (or was it press-ganged?) into doing it And the destination will be Lindisfarne? :o) -- Chris
From: Daz on 4 May 2010 05:13 On 03/05/2010 15:05, Veggie Dave wrote: <snip> > Unless things have changed then simply sending is all the proof they > require. > I enjoyed reading this one the other day. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/03/dvla_court/ -- Daz
From: Hog on 4 May 2010 05:21 Lozzo wrote: > Veggie Dave wrote: > >> doetnietcomputeren <doesnotcompute(a)gmail.com> wrote the following >> literary masterpiece: >>> IIRC Working days, and sent does not mean received, as long as >>> sending can be proven. >> >> Unless things have changed then simply sending is all the proof they >> require. > > Still the same rules. You can be fucked over even if you never receive > an NIP. Suppose it's sent back Registered by a friendly neighbour marked "No longer at this address" -- Hog
From: doetnietcomputeren on 4 May 2010 05:21
On 2010-05-04 11:21:40 +0200, "Hog" <sm911SPAM(a)CHIPShotmail.co.uk> said: >>> >>>> IIRC Working days, and sent does not mean received, as long as >>>> sending can be proven. >>> >>> Unless things have changed then simply sending is all the proof they >>> require. >> >> Still the same rules. You can be fucked over even if you never receive >> an NIP. > > Suppose it's sent back Registered by a friendly neighbour marked "No longer > at this address" The notice of intended prosecution of the person, not the person of a specific address. -- Dnc |