UKRM Run 2010
in [UK Motorcycles]
|
From: ginge on 4 May 2010 05:24 On Tue, 4 May 2010 10:21:40 +0100, "Hog" <sm911SPAM(a)CHIPShotmail.co.uk> wrote: >Lozzo wrote: >> Veggie Dave wrote: >> >>> doetnietcomputeren <doesnotcompute(a)gmail.com> wrote the following >>> literary masterpiece: >>>> IIRC Working days, and sent does not mean received, as long as >>>> sending can be proven. >>> >>> Unless things have changed then simply sending is all the proof they >>> require. >> >> Still the same rules. You can be fucked over even if you never receive >> an NIP. > >Suppose it's sent back Registered by a friendly neighbour marked "No longer >at this address" Then when they eventiually did catch up with you you'd stand to be done for not having the correct registered keeper details on the vehicle. HTH.
From: Hog on 4 May 2010 05:36 ginge wrote: > On Tue, 4 May 2010 10:21:40 +0100, "Hog" > <sm911SPAM(a)CHIPShotmail.co.uk> wrote: > >> Lozzo wrote: >>> Veggie Dave wrote: >>> >>>> doetnietcomputeren <doesnotcompute(a)gmail.com> wrote the following >>>> literary masterpiece: >>>>> IIRC Working days, and sent does not mean received, as long as >>>>> sending can be proven. >>>> >>>> Unless things have changed then simply sending is all the proof >>>> they require. >>> >>> Still the same rules. You can be fucked over even if you never >>> receive an NIP. >> >> Suppose it's sent back Registered by a friendly neighbour marked "No >> longer at this address" > > Then when they eventiually did catch up with you you'd stand to be > done for not having the correct registered keeper details on the > vehicle. > > HTH. OK I'll add "address in another jurisdiction" -- Hog
From: ogden on 4 May 2010 05:38 Daz wrote: > On 03/05/2010 15:05, Veggie Dave wrote: > > <snip> > > > Unless things have changed then simply sending is all the proof they > > require. > > > I enjoyed reading this one the other day. > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/03/dvla_court/ As did everyone else when it was posted here. -- ogden | gsxr1000 | rgv250
From: ginge on 4 May 2010 05:41 On Tue, 4 May 2010 10:36:48 +0100, "Hog" <sm911SPAM(a)CHIPShotmail.co.uk> wrote: >ginge wrote: >> On Tue, 4 May 2010 10:21:40 +0100, "Hog" >> <sm911SPAM(a)CHIPShotmail.co.uk> wrote: >> >>> Lozzo wrote: >>>> Veggie Dave wrote: >>>> >>>>> doetnietcomputeren <doesnotcompute(a)gmail.com> wrote the following >>>>> literary masterpiece: >>>>>> IIRC Working days, and sent does not mean received, as long as >>>>>> sending can be proven. >>>>> >>>>> Unless things have changed then simply sending is all the proof >>>>> they require. >>>> >>>> Still the same rules. You can be fucked over even if you never >>>> receive an NIP. >>> >>> Suppose it's sent back Registered by a friendly neighbour marked "No >>> longer at this address" >> >> Then when they eventiually did catch up with you you'd stand to be >> done for not having the correct registered keeper details on the >> vehicle. >> >> HTH. > >OK I'll add "address in another jurisdiction" Then I'd expect your number plate to go onto the ANPR database so they can stop you next time you pass a police car. You're just fiddling the system as it's not like your vehicle isn't really permanently used on the mainland.
From: DozynSleepy on 4 May 2010 06:04
On 04/05/2010 09:39, CT wrote: > Wicked Uncle Nigel wrote: > >> The GTR is distressingly thirsty when pressing on. I filled up near >> St Quentin, and got the low fuel light as I approached the port. > > Try riding with two Ducatis. > > Fill up, thrash 60 miles up the Autoroute at "interesting" speeds and > then stop to fill up again! > Heh, avoidance of the autoroute average speed tax ;-) -- DozynSleepy Ducatenstein ST4s |