From: Dean on

>>Tom wrote...
>>>
>>> have you tried the SA xd xdm series?
>>>
>>> wow a really nice pistol and IMO the only so far that can compete with
>>> the glocks (at least for smooth shooting and fit)
>>
>>I do not like the way that Glocks feel.
>
>I like to shoot the glock in glock matches, I do not like they way a
>glock points
>
>
>>I do however like my XD40 and would
>>like to get an XD45.
>
>, the XD's point more like the 1911 in my hand, have you done a full
>trigger job on one yet? M U C H better! taking out the over travel
>was the best part of it!, and a much shorter reset, pull and at about
>3.5 lbs
>

I'd tie a can to all those brands and go with a Kahr. I've had a
department approved PM9, with Tritium night sights & 6,7,8 capacity
mags., for 5 years

IMHO: Double stacked autos are fine duty weapons or for plinkers. But
as concealed weapons; they suck unless you are wearing bulky clothes,
a jacket, coat, or can wear an inside the trouser holster without the
weapon poking your fat gut or love handles without mercy.

For you fat asses who want a really concealable, reliable, firearm in
9mm or .40 cal., get a Kahr. For $209.00 they have a compact laser
sight that mounts ahead of the trigger guard also.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kahr_Arms

http://www.auto-ordnance.com/AO-4.html#09chicagoPD

Crimson Trace Sight for Polymer Frame Kahr Pistols
http://www.kahrshop.com/cgi-bin/itemdetail.asp?itmid=1985

ymmv


Dean
EKIII
'06FLHR
From: JD on
Dean wrote:
>>> Tom wrote...
>>>> have you tried the SA xd xdm series?
>>>>
>>>> wow a really nice pistol and IMO the only so far that can compete with
>>>> the glocks (at least for smooth shooting and fit)
>>> I do not like the way that Glocks feel.
>> I like to shoot the glock in glock matches, I do not like they way a
>> glock points
>>
>>
>>> I do however like my XD40 and would
>>> like to get an XD45.
>> , the XD's point more like the 1911 in my hand, have you done a full
>> trigger job on one yet? M U C H better! taking out the over travel
>> was the best part of it!, and a much shorter reset, pull and at about
>> 3.5 lbs
>>
>
> I'd tie a can to all those brands and go with a Kahr. I've had a
> department approved PM9, with Tritium night sights & 6,7,8 capacity
> mags., for 5 years
>
> IMHO: Double stacked autos are fine duty weapons or for plinkers. But
> as concealed weapons; they suck unless you are wearing bulky clothes,
> a jacket, coat, or can wear an inside the trouser holster without the
> weapon poking your fat gut or love handles without mercy.
>
> For you fat asses who want a really concealable, reliable, firearm in
> 9mm or .40 cal., get a Kahr. For $209.00 they have a compact laser
> sight that mounts ahead of the trigger guard also.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kahr_Arms
>
> http://www.auto-ordnance.com/AO-4.html#09chicagoPD
>
> Crimson Trace Sight for Polymer Frame Kahr Pistols
> http://www.kahrshop.com/cgi-bin/itemdetail.asp?itmid=1985
>
> ymmv
>
>
> Dean
> EKIII
> '06FLHR

Gotta concur on the Kahr; it's a nice piece. I
lean toward stump simple for daily carry, a Ruger
LCR fills the bill there.
From: MrScottly#54 on
On Dec 2, 1:22 pm, Dean <gd...(a)neo.rr.com> wrote:

>For $209.00 they have a compact laser
> sight that mounts ahead of the trigger guard also.
>


No offense...but the only thing laser sights do on a handgun is show
you how poorly you are controlling the trigger.


It's always fun to watch someone on the range bounce the little light
dot all over the place, somehow thinking that it will magically allow
them to hit their target.


MrScottly#54
From: Arie Bresser on
"Dean" wrote...
>
> I'd tie a can to all those brands and go with a Kahr. I've had a
> department approved PM9, with Tritium night sights & 6,7,8 capacity
> mags., for 5 years

Had a Kahr. Past tense.
Not a bad pistol,
just wasn't right for me.
From: LarryInEastTn on
"Johan Rossi" <fyyff666(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:hf72bt$166$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>
> I'm purchasing one very soon. I was thinking of a Walther PPK380, but this
> looks interesting.
> --
> John

The PPK is nice. I have a knock off of it. A .380 isn't what I would call
a real defense round, more of a get up off of me round. But it can be
fairly devestating in the right configuation. Check the site below. Quote,
"
The compressed Tungsten-NyTriliumT Composite, fragments upon impact, leaving
a wound channel of catastrophic proportions. "

http://www.extremeshockusa.com/cgistore/store.cgi?page=/new/product.html&setup=1&ida=72&idp=14&his=0|14&cart_id=466918.1788
--
Larry AH#136
Owner, rmh VB&G



First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Prev: Oil Catch Pan
Next: Wide Glide Broke