Chicago Mayor blames "guns".
in [Motorcycles]
|
Prev: 'Lectro bike price drop
Next: Soapbox-derby style trike
From: Jim Alder on 12 Nov 2009 15:07 Lookout <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Benj <bjacoby(a)iwaynet.net> > wrote: > >>On Nov 12, 12:49�am, Lookout <mrLook...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> Until the other day strict gun and gun owner control has worked just >>> fine on military installations. The proof is there. You can't ignore >>> it. >> >>The proof is in the massacre! > > ONE massacre...as opposed to how many in the US year? Were there any this year? >>Obviously, gun control claimed a bunch more victims. > > Wrong. A lack of gun control allows "a bunch" more victims every year > in the US Nope. Too much gun control killed them, too. > As Lenin noticed, an armed man can shoot 100 unarmed >>men. > > Asinine example. Tell it to Lenin. >> Worked on the Virginia Tech campus (a gun-free zone) and worked >>on a military base too. They had to wait for local police to come and >>disable the killer. Gosh that was REALLY "preventing" shootings wasn't >>it? > > And how many killings take place on college campuses and military > installations as compared to on the streets every day. You lose that > argument every time. Only when you get to name yourself referee. Colleges and military bases hardly compare to the great unwashed on the streets. Drug conflicts and robberies are uncommon on campus and military base. >>The only proof that I see is that you were born without a brain. > > And when you don't have a logical argument you insult. Just like you > learned in 4th grade..and you've never grownup > >> Don't >>worry though, I hear there are lots of liberal media who will hire you >>as a propagan...er...journalist. Now THAT is an insult. -- So, how's that whole "hopey - changey" thing working out for you so far?
From: Lookout on 12 Nov 2009 15:15 On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:57:18 -0500, Berry Oakley <AllmanBrothers(a)bass.gov> wrote: >Lookout wrote: > >> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:30:25 -0800 (PST), Straightarrow >> <hoofhearted07(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> Oh..and welcome to my filter > >Advertising what a coward you are... again? > >You DO know that you could just IGNORE somebody, instead of your way, by >advertising the fact that you have no spine, and to use supposed >SOFTWARE to "filter? somebody? Nah..nothing to do with spine. I chose to ignore people for a variety of reason. I'm being polite. Is that a problem? Or do you claim to know what I'm thinking?
From: Lookout on 12 Nov 2009 15:15 On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:08:00 -0500, "Vito" <vito(a)cfl.rr.com> wrote: ><herman(a)comic.stp> wrote >| So! If there's no guns people will not be killing each other? Man they >| will find a way! When I was a little kid it was the ice pick that was >| used. I can make a zip-gun using black powder. Even if I have to make >| the B/P myself. I can kill a person using a rolled up newspaper. Want >| to out law newspapers?I can make a shank out of almost anything! >| A gun is only as dangerous as the nut pulling the trigger! Cars kill >| more people a year then guns. I don't drive so lets out law cars! >| > >Drop it man, you'r right but you are arguing against irrational phobia. > >Someone said that the real test of madness is doing the same thing over and >over ever expecting a different result. Many US jurisdictions have tried >keeping guns off the streets. It needs to be a FEDERAL move and not local. Can you understand that?
From: Lookout on 12 Nov 2009 15:16 On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:25:52 -0600, "RM v2.0" <Blah(a)spamsux.com> wrote: >> No one is denying that. >> >>>Maybe they will shoot you next. >> >> I don't live in Chicago. >> >> The problem is a lack of gun and gun owner control.. > >What a dumbass statement. THEY ARE BANNED! How much more control can you >get? > At the federal level Dumbass
From: Lookout on 12 Nov 2009 15:17
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:29:27 -0600, "RM v2.0" <Blah(a)spamsux.com> wrote: >> It's not a lack of guns..you're missing the point. There are a lot of >> US military personnel who won their own weapons. The fact is that they >> are locked up in a secure place AWAY FROM THE OWNER when not in use. >> This stops crimes of passion such as a fight with a spouse. It's OWN >> CONTOL as much as gun control IMHO. >> ALL hand guns should be licensed >> ALL hand guns owner should be registered AFTER proper training and >> screening >> >> Simple and no one is being deprived of a gun. > >Ok, how are you going to get the criminals to do that? Nasan was trained and >screened. > Stupid question. |