Chicago Mayor blames "guns".
in [Motorcycles]
|
Prev: 'Lectro bike price drop
Next: Soapbox-derby style trike
From: Lookout on 12 Nov 2009 15:17 On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:30:24 -0600, "RM v2.0" <Blah(a)spamsux.com> wrote: > >"Lookout" <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >news:ataof55m57mqqtibaa81f4am1pfrsm1u9p(a)4ax.com... >> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:48:18 -0800 (PST), Benj <bjacoby(a)iwaynet.net> >> wrote: >> >>>On Nov 12, 12:46 am, Lookout <mrLook...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>>> There are. Look at military installations. >>>> It won't work at the state level as you can just go to the next state >>>> and buy what you want. We need NATIONAL laws that are enforced. >>> >>>Nope won't work there either, "lookout". People will just have the >>>flood of "immigrants" from mexico import a flod of guns along with >>>themselves. >> >> And I think the borders should be closed. >> >> Oopps..there goes my "liberal" title again > >Not closed but locked down tighter. > A klaus nym shift. Welcome to my filter.
From: Berry Oakley on 12 Nov 2009 15:26 Lookout wrote: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:57:18 -0500, Berry Oakley > <AllmanBrothers(a)bass.gov> wrote: > > >>Lookout wrote: >> >> >>>On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:30:25 -0800 (PST), Straightarrow >>><hoofhearted07(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>>Oh..and welcome to my filter >> >>Advertising what a coward you are... again? >> >>You DO know that you could just IGNORE somebody, instead of your way, by >>advertising the fact that you have no spine, and to use supposed >>SOFTWARE to "filter? somebody? > > > Nah..nothing to do with spine. Bingo! You.. lack one! > I chose to ignore people for a variety > of reason. I'm being polite. Is that a problem? You advertised that you would ignore him, instead of just doing it. You cowered and ran away. > Or do you claim to know what I'm thinking? Yes, I do have that ability.
From: Berry Oakley on 12 Nov 2009 15:28 Lookout wrote: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:30:24 -0600, "RM v2.0" <Blah(a)spamsux.com> > wrote: > > >>"Lookout" <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >>news:ataof55m57mqqtibaa81f4am1pfrsm1u9p(a)4ax.com... >> >>>On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:48:18 -0800 (PST), Benj <bjacoby(a)iwaynet.net> >>>wrote: >>> >>> >>>>On Nov 12, 12:46 am, Lookout <mrLook...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>There are. Look at military installations. >>>>>It won't work at the state level as you can just go to the next state >>>>>and buy what you want. We need NATIONAL laws that are enforced. >>>> >>>>Nope won't work there either, "lookout". People will just have the >>>>flood of "immigrants" from mexico import a flod of guns along with >>>>themselves. >>> >>>And I think the borders should be closed. >>> >>>Oopps..there goes my "liberal" title again >> >>Not closed but locked down tighter. >> > > A klaus nym shift. Welcome to my filter. More RUNNING AWAY with a "filter?"
From: The Daring Dufas on 12 Nov 2009 15:34 Lookout wrote: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:08:00 -0500, "Vito" <vito(a)cfl.rr.com> wrote: > >> <herman(a)comic.stp> wrote >> | So! If there's no guns people will not be killing each other? Man they >> | will find a way! When I was a little kid it was the ice pick that was >> | used. I can make a zip-gun using black powder. Even if I have to make >> | the B/P myself. I can kill a person using a rolled up newspaper. Want >> | to out law newspapers?I can make a shank out of almost anything! >> | A gun is only as dangerous as the nut pulling the trigger! Cars kill >> | more people a year then guns. I don't drive so lets out law cars! >> | >> >> Drop it man, you'r right but you are arguing against irrational phobia. >> >> Someone said that the real test of madness is doing the same thing over and >> over ever expecting a different result. Many US jurisdictions have tried >> keeping guns off the streets. > > It needs to be a FEDERAL move and not local. Can you understand that? > > It worked in Nazi Germany, it should work here. TDD
From: RD (The Sandman) on 12 Nov 2009 15:34
Jim Alder <jimalder(a)ssnet.com> wrote in news:Xns9CC199D0DFD93jimaldersssnetcom(a)216.196.97.142: > Lookout <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> Benj <bjacoby(a)iwaynet.net> >> wrote: >> >>>On Nov 12, 12:49�am, Lookout <mrLook...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Until the other day strict gun and gun owner control has worked >>>> just fine on military installations. The proof is there. You can't >>>> ignore it. >>> >>>The proof is in the massacre! >> >> ONE massacre...as opposed to how many in the US year? > > Were there any this year? > >>>Obviously, gun control claimed a bunch more victims. >> >> Wrong. A lack of gun control allows "a bunch" more victims every year >> in the US > > Nope. Too much gun control killed them, too. Exactomundo!! Bans and laws can have a bad effect as much as they could ever have a good one. >> As Lenin noticed, an armed man can shoot 100 unarmed >>>men. >> >> Asinine example. > > Tell it to Lenin. I believe Lenin said that an armed man can *control* 100 unarmed ones. That would be via the threat of shooting, not the killing of the 100 men itself. >>> Worked on the Virginia Tech campus (a gun-free zone) and worked >>>on a military base too. They had to wait for local police to come and >>>disable the killer. Gosh that was REALLY "preventing" shootings >>>wasn't it? >> >> And how many killings take place on college campuses and military >> installations as compared to on the streets every day. You lose that >> argument every time. > > Only when you get to name yourself referee. Colleges and military > bases > hardly compare to the great unwashed on the streets. Bingo! > Drug conflicts > and robberies are uncommon on campus and military base. Yet, in a large majority of the homicides (80%, IIRC) at least one of the parties is involved in either drug or gang activity. -- Sleep well tonight, RD (The Sandman) Let's see if I have this healthcare thingy right. Congress is to pass a plan written by a committee whose head has said he doesn't understand it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it, signed by a president who hasn't read it, with funding administered by a Treasury chief who didn't pay his taxes because he didn't understand TurboTax, overseen by an obese Surgeon General and financed by a country that's nearly broke. What could possibly go wrong? |