From: Outback Jon on
Jack Hunt wrote:
> It's called a tip-over wing and I bet it's more than $20. Ain't nothin' on an ST
> for $20.

Well, there are the valve stems... And you could probably replace the
handgrips with aftermarket... :)


--
"Outback" Jon - KC2BNE
outback_jon(a)g.no.sp.am.mail.com
http://folding.stanford.edu - got folding? Team 32

2006 ZG1000A Concours "Blueline" COG# 7385 CDA# 0157
From: Gaidheal on
On Dec 27, 8:19 pm, "Datesfat Chicks" <datesfat.chi...(a)gmail.com>
wrote:

> I looked it up on the Internet.  I had no idea it was about 715 lbs. (I was
> thinking it was maybe 550 lbs.).

The St is not only heavy, it has a high center of gravity with that
longitudinally-mounted V-4 engine.

And, with the skinny tires, it's like an elephant on roller skates...
From: The Older Gentleman on
Gaidheal <breoganmacbrath(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

Oh dear, more Krusty bollocks.

> The St is not only heavy, it has a high center of gravity with that
> longitudinally-mounted V-4 engine.

Not really, no, because the crank (the heavy bit) is low down and ditto
the gearbox.

You might as well accuse a Guzzi of having a high C of G because of its
engine layout.

As well, if you think about it, because of the V configuration, its
heads and cams are actually *lower* than they would be with a
conventional transverse four engine (slant-block lumps excepted).

You've never ridden one, so what do you know?


--
BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F Triumph Street Triple
Suzuki TS250ER GN250 Damn, back to six bikes!
Try Googling before asking a damn silly question.
chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
From: Gaidheal on
On Dec 28, 10:24 am, totallydeadmail...(a)yahoo.co.uk (The Older
Gentleman) wrote:

> As well, if you think about it, because of the V configuration, its
> heads and cams are actually *lower* than they would be with a
> conventional transverse four engine (slant-block lumps excepted).

Moments related of CoM work along all three axes, Bertie.
>
> You've never ridden one, so what do you know?

Dood, you do not know that for certain, fer sure.
From: Outback Jon on
Gaidheal wrote:
> On Dec 28, 10:24 am, totallydeadmail...(a)yahoo.co.uk (The Older
> Gentleman) wrote:
>
>> As well, if you think about it, because of the V configuration, its
>> heads and cams are actually *lower* than they would be with a
>> conventional transverse four engine (slant-block lumps excepted).
>
> Moments related of CoM work along all three axes, Bertie.
>> You've never ridden one, so what do you know?
>
> Dood, you do not know that for certain, fer sure.

No, but you're probably related to someone that has.

--
"Outback" Jon - KC2BNE
outback_jon(a)g.no.sp.am.mail.com
http://folding.stanford.edu - got folding? Team 32

2006 ZG1000A Concours "Blueline" COG# 7385 CDA# 0157
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Prev: Solstice Party
Next: Albertan on Vehicles