From: Hog on
Andy Bonwick <nospam(a)bonwick.me.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:01:36 +0100, "Hog"

>> Johnson certainly insisted America was not at war with NV for the
>> period up to the Tet offensive. Indeed looking it up since Congress
>> never declared a state of war. It was a "Police Action".
>>
> I'm sure I can find a lot more references to the Vietnam _War_ than
> you can to the Vietnam _Police Action_ but I'll be more than happy to
> admit I'm wrong if you provide evidence to prove otherwise.

FFS how hard is it to get the head around the observation, which was the US
Government never declared a state of war. Congress refused to vote it so.
You can call it a sunday school picnic if you like.

Much like Westminster refused to to call the war with the IRA a war.

And then my further observation was in both cases (IMHO) it affected how the
Police Action was dealt with.

--
Hog


From: Berf on
CT wrote
>
> Simon S-B wrote:
>
> > > Bob Hope did not play police actions, but he did play Vietnam, ergo
> > > it was a war.
> > >
> > > Anyone who says otherwise is a thick-o.
> >
> >
> > Love it! The only problem is now who has taken his role as the
> > war-o-meter?
>
> In the UK it always used to be Kate Adie.
>
> Not sure now though...

The german girls were better. I saw them in the stands.
From: Hog on
Lozzo <lozzo(a)lozzo.org.uk> wrote:
> steve auvache wrote:
>
>> Personally I figured something was not right about it all when Harold
>> Wilson one day announced that the gummint was planning on
>> reintroducing national service so that we too could join in the
>> slaughter and do our bit for democracy and freedom and contribute
>> thousands of British lives to the non war effort.
>
> My dad went to Vietnam as an observer when we lived in Singapore, this
> was sometime between Jan 1966 and Dec 1969. He came home after 6
> months out there and hasn't spoken much about it since. He has told
> me he was amazed the war lasted so long, because the US forces were
> so badly trained, had totally the wrong attitude and were so
> unprofessional in everything they did. His report detailed all of
> this and was tossed out as being politically inflammatory. The
> Vietnam episode was what made him decide to leave altogether when his
> 22 years were up - he had thought about signing on for another 9.

Well ya certainly can't fault his powers of observation.

I've always wondered how a straight fight in Europe between the Germans and
the Yanks, without any British involvement, would have gone.

1:0 I reckon.

--
Hog


From: Hog on
mower man <nospam(a)f2s.com> wrote:

> the USA. Nixon was far more involved at the time than the woman I
> would like to have had a state funeral many years ago. (In 1984 after
> the failed IRA bombing to be exact. Why didn't you get it right,
> boys?)

So there we have it. You think that a bunch of deranged (pseudo marxist)
terrorists killing members of the elected British Government is a good
thing.
I was right, you are a window licking idiot.

--
Hog


From: M J Carley on
In the referenced article, "Hog" <sm911SPAM(a)CHIPShotmail.co.uk> writes:

>So there we have it. You think that a bunch of deranged (pseudo
>marxist) terrorists killing members of the elected British Government
>is a good thing.

Not fair: the Provos had split because they objected to Sticky
Marxism. The (pseudo-) Marxists mostly shot each other.
--
Si deve tornare alle basi: Marx ed i Clash.

Michael Carley: http://people.bath.ac.uk/ensmjc/