From: mower man on 28 Jun 2010 18:48 Beav wrote: > > > "Alister" <alister.ware(a)ntlworld.com> wrote in message > news:xYNVn.30962$U%7.30457(a)hurricane... >> On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 12:17:35 -0700, Lclawitcx wrote: >> >>> On 27 June, 19:58, Tosspot <Frank.Le...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 27/06/10 19:12, Lclawitcx wrote: >>>> >>>> > Oh dear, we destroyed you English racists. Thousands of you started >>>> > off spouting your xenopobic chants about black people and the war >>>> > outside the stadium, then it finished with you crying. This brings to >>>> > an end the months of embarrassing English flag waving nationalism >>>> > that even made Americans cringe. >>>> >>>> > A video summing up the English limeys world cup. >>>> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5kvpm_bTk4 >>>> >>>> > "The English are a nation of cowards" >>>> >>>> Yeah, but we're still 2:0 on World Wars. >>> >>> The English contribution to WW2(which was laughably) consisted of >>> running away like cowards and diving in to the sea at Dunkirk. Then >>> waiting 4 years while the Americans and Russians won the actual war. >> >> The Russians almost certainly won the war which would have been very bad >> for the USA if we had not Won the battle of Britain ( which was fought >> before the USA even entered the war). >> There would have been no staging post for the 'D' day landings which >> would almost certainly handed the whole of Europe to the USSR. >> >> So far from saving our bacon in truth we saved yours. >> >> >>> 1 on 1 against Germany the English would have been annihilated. >> >> Did you check the score line for the Battle or Britain? I though not. > > Maybe he should check the score line for Vietnam while he's at it. > Vietnam was not a war. -- Chris I am not young enough to know everything. Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900)
From: Andrew Dunford on 28 Jun 2010 18:58 "Two Dogs" <nzrebel(a)verizon.net> wrote in message news:b7c08416-77da-428c-a6d6-ecf3dc39facb(a)z10g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > On Jun 28, 1:05 pm, "ian field" <gangprobing.al...(a)ntlworld.com> > wrote: >> "Alister" <alister.w...(a)ntlworld.com> wrote in message >> >> news:xYNVn.30962$U%7.30457(a)hurricane... >> >> >> >> > On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 12:17:35 -0700, Lclawitcx wrote: >> >> >> On 27 June, 19:58, Tosspot <Frank.Le...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 27/06/10 19:12, Lclawitcx wrote: >> >> >>> > Oh dear, we destroyed you English racists. Thousands of you started >> >>> > off spouting your xenopobic chants about black people and the war >> >>> > outside the stadium, then it finished with you crying. This brings >> >>> > to >> >>> > an end the months of embarrassing English flag waving nationalism >> >>> > that even made Americans cringe. >> >> >>> > A video summing up the English limeys world cup. >> >>> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5kvpm_bTk4 >> >> >>> > "The English are a nation of cowards" >> >> >>> Yeah, but we're still 2:0 on World Wars. >> >> >> The English contribution to WW2(which was laughably) consisted of >> >> running away like cowards and diving in to the sea at Dunkirk. Then >> >> waiting 4 years while the Americans and Russians won the actual war. >> >> > The Russians almost certainly won the war which would have been very >> > bad >> > for the USA if we had not Won the battle of Britain ( which was fought >> > before the USA even entered the war). >> > There would have been no staging post for the 'D' day landings which >> > would almost certainly handed the whole of Europe to the USSR. >> >> > So far from saving our bacon in truth we saved yours. >> >> >> 1 on 1 against Germany the English would have been annihilated. >> >> > Did you check the score line for the Battle or Britain? I though not. >> >> The Stuka was a shinning example of German efficiency - the only fighter >> in >> WW2 that needed a fighter escort and every time our lads shot one down >> they >> got 2 Nazis for the price of one. >> >> And if the Yanks start on about saving our bacon, remind them that Hitler >> had his boffins working on dirty nukes (the best they could do without >> all >> their Jewish scientists) and the means to drop them on the USA. >> >> There were several versions of the "Amerikabomber" on the drawing board >> along with plans for a long range booster stage for the V2 rocket. >> >> And the Yanks weren't doing us any favours, Hitler formally declared war >> on >> the US a few days after the Japs hit Pearl Harbour - from that point on >> we >> were basically running up a lend-lease debt to fight their war for them. > > Oh dear Ian, get your facts from war comics, do you? Or from reading > Rainer Karlsh? Next you'll be quoting from the Hitler Dairies. Mine's a banana milkshake, with an egg in it. <snip> Andrew
From: Andrew Dunford on 28 Jun 2010 19:09 "Klitty" <mitticus(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:i0amhb$eug$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > "SIRPip" <gingerbloke(a)gmail.com> writes: > >> Klitty wrote: >> >>> CS <crmstone(a)googlemail.com> writes: >>> >>> > Lclawitcx - you clearly have a problem with simple primary school >>> > comprehension. If you had not guessed from the title this group is >>> > about F1, not football. However, I do accept that as both sports >>> > start with an "F", you small brain is probably confused. Best you >>> > lie down, take the ADHD pill and think it through slowly and calmly. >>> >>> It's always funny to see someone take the intellectual high ground and >>> come crashing down with his panties around his ankles and Mature >>> hoving into view ... >>> >>> Hint : Look at the Newsgroups line. There is no "this group". >> >> I take your first point, because it's a good one and it is amusing. >> Check his truncated 'follow-up' line though - he'd cut it to one group, >> presumably his own. > > Immaterial. The OP was not. And he replied to a post other than the one he was addressing, and didn't bother to quote in his reply, both of which cause unnecessary confusion. Apart from that, great post. Andrew
From: Lozzo on 28 Jun 2010 19:21 mower man wrote: > Beav wrote: > > > > > >"Alister" <alister.ware(a)ntlworld.com> wrote in message > news:xYNVn.30962$U%7.30457(a)hurricane... > > > On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 12:17:35 -0700, Lclawitcx wrote: > > > > >>>On 27 June, 19:58, Tosspot <Frank.Le...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On 27/06/10 19:12, Lclawitcx wrote: > > > > > > >>>>> Oh dear, we destroyed you English racists. Thousands of you > started >>>>> off spouting your xenopobic chants about black people > and the war >>>>> outside the stadium, then it finished with you > crying. This brings to >>>>> an end the months of embarrassing > English flag waving nationalism >>>>> that even made Americans cringe. > > > > > > >>>>> A video summing up the English limeys world cup. > > > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5kvpm_bTk4 > > > > > > >>>>> "The English are a nation of cowards" > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, but we're still 2:0 on World Wars. > > > > > > > > The English contribution to WW2(which was laughably) consisted > > > > of running away like cowards and diving in to the sea at > > > > Dunkirk. Then waiting 4 years while the Americans and Russians > > > > won the actual war. > > > > > > The Russians almost certainly won the war which would have been > > > very bad for the USA if we had not Won the battle of Britain ( > > > which was fought before the USA even entered the war). > > > There would have been no staging post for the 'D' day landings > > > which would almost certainly handed the whole of Europe to the > > > USSR. > > > > > > So far from saving our bacon in truth we saved yours. > > > > > > > > > > 1 on 1 against Germany the English would have been annihilated. > > > > > > Did you check the score line for the Battle or Britain? I though > > > not. > > > > Maybe he should check the score line for Vietnam while he's at it. > > > > Vietnam was not a war. Every mention of the conflict calls it a war. The Wiki etymology specifically calls it a war. -- Lozzo Versys 650 Tourer, CBR600F-W racebike in the making, TS250C, RD400F (somewhere)
From: Borg on 28 Jun 2010 20:00
Dresden.. |