From: Vito on
S'mee wrote:
> No that was a educated response to an IDIOT not properly securing the
> gun.

or a nervous nelly.


From: S'mee on
On Apr 15, 2:38 pm, "Vito" <v...(a)cfl.rr.com> wrote:
> S'mee wrote:
> > No that was a educated response to an IDIOT not properly securing the
> > gun.
>
> or a nervous nelly.

NOpe you is wrong.
From: Vito on
S'mee wrote:
> On Apr 15, 2:38 pm, "Vito" <v...(a)cfl.rr.com> wrote:
>> S'mee wrote:
>>> No that was a educated response to an IDIOT not properly securing
>>> the gun.
>>
>> or a nervous nelly.
>
> NOpe you is wrong.

OK you're right. Irresponsible people shouldn't have guns. That's why they
disarmed most AF personel after Tet.


From: S'mee on
On Apr 16, 6:03 am, "Vito" <v...(a)cfl.rr.com> wrote:
> S'mee wrote:
> > On Apr 15, 2:38 pm, "Vito" <v...(a)cfl.rr.com> wrote:
> >> S'mee wrote:
> >>> No that was a educated response to an IDIOT not properly securing
> >>> the gun.
>
> >> or a nervous nelly.
>
> > NOpe you is wrong.
>
> OK you're right. Irresponsible people shouldn't have guns.  That's why they
> disarmed most AF personel after Tet.

yep, except for the pararescue guys (only troops in the us military I
WONT tease) none of the airfaces ground personal should be allowed
firearms...