Ping S'mee- OT Army stuff:
in [Motorcycles]
|
From: The Older Gentleman on 5 Aug 2010 08:58 BrianNZ <brian(a)itnz.co.nz> wrote: > > Thanks for that , the best laugh of the day! Do you keep a list of the > less than complimentary remarks as well? :) Wow. Imagine the amount of memory needed :-) -- BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Triumph Street Triple Honda CB400F Suzuki TS250 Suzuki GN250 chateaudotmurrayatidnetdotcom Nothing damages a machine more than an ignoramus with a manual, a can-do attitude and a set of cheap tools
From: Henry on 5 Aug 2010 09:21 The Older Clown timidly chirped: > BrianNZ <brian(a)itnz.co.nz> wrote: >> Thanks for that , the best laugh of the day! Do you keep a list of the >> less than complimentary remarks as well? :) > Wow. Imagine the amount of memory needed :-) I'd have to get a separate hard drive just to hold the childish kook rants and lies that you and twitbull have spewed while hiding behind your killfiles. :-) But of course, Brian was referring to less than complimentary remarks on the quality of my writing, not the psychotic hysterics of the few usenet nut jobs who get all upset up over the content. No one is surprised that you failed to comprehend the difference, though... <vbg> -- "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: S'mee on 5 Aug 2010 09:59 On Aug 5, 7:21 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > The Older Clown timidly chirped: > > > BrianNZ <br...(a)itnz.co.nz> wrote: > >> Thanks for that , the best laugh of the day! Do you keep a list of the > >> less than complimentary remarks as well? :) > > Wow. Imagine the amount of memory needed :-) > > I'd have to get a separate hard drive just to hold the childish > kook rants and lies that you and twitbull have spewed while hiding > behind your killfiles. :-) > But of course, Brian was referring to less than complimentary remarks > on the quality of my writing, not the psychotic hysterics of the few > usenet nut jobs who get all upset up over the content. No one is > surprised that you failed to comprehend the difference, though... <vbg> > So what you are amditing is you have no brain and no balls and have even less memory than a philandering politician.
From: Henry on 5 Aug 2010 10:12 S'mee smeed: > On Aug 5, 7:21 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: >> The Older Clown timidly chirped: >>> BrianNZ <br...(a)itnz.co.nz> wrote: >>>> Thanks for that , the best laugh of the day! Do you keep a list of the >>>> less than complimentary remarks as well? :) >>> Wow. Imagine the amount of memory needed :-) >> I'd have to get a separate hard drive just to hold the childish >> kook rants and lies that you and twitbull have spewed while hiding >> behind your killfiles. :-) >> But of course, Brian was referring to less than complimentary remarks >> on the quality of my writing, not the psychotic hysterics of the few >> usenet nut jobs who get all upset up over the content. No one is >> surprised that you failed to comprehend the difference, though... <vbg> > So what you are amditing is you have no brain and no balls and have > even less memory than a philandering politician. Do you clean the blood and fleshy bits out of your keyboard after each post, or do you have a stock of keyboards on hand? Rhetorical btw, have someone look it up for ya. Here's you smeeing out a post... <chuckle> http://www.bikes-n-spikes.org/misc/DeathByKeyboard.gif -- -- "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: BrianNZ on 5 Aug 2010 15:37
Henry wrote: > BrianNZ wrote: >> Henry wrote: > >>> Here in the real world, I'm the recipient of many compliments >>> on the quality of my writing. > >> Thanks for that , the best laugh of the day! > > Not sure what you find humorous there, but you're welcome! > >> Do you keep a list of the less than complimentary remarks as well? :) > > I can't recall anyone telling me that I don;t write well, although > a few folks have taken issue with some of the content. ;-) > >> ...and what you do is 'repetitive cut'n'pastes', not 'writing'. > > Right, I've never typed a word of my own. You wouldn't believe how > long it took me to search the web to find the right text for this > reply. Thank *you* for the laughs, Bri... <g> > By the way, if I were to "cut'n'paste", no text would show up, and > the nutters/sheep would have nothing to whine about. The phrase > you're "thinking" of is "copy'n'paste". You're welcome... > > > > ??? It's the 'paste' part that gets the text to show.....the 'cut' or 'copy' is the method the information to be 'pasted' is gathered. In this post you have restrained yourself by not mentioning WTC7 or 9/11....just check any of your other posts to find the cut'n'pastes I refer to. |