Since we like to talk about guns
in [Motorcycles]
|
From: Henry on 8 Jul 2010 14:21 Twitbull squeaked: > Latino gangs aren't "out to get you". But those fearsome Arab gangs are - you know, the gangs lead by the Cave Man with his magic, invisible, skyscraper disintegrating fires. Be afraid, twit - be *very* afraid. The Cave Man is still out there... <chuckle> -- "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: Twibil on 8 Jul 2010 14:23 On Jul 8, 6:40 am, "S'mee" <stevenkei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Whatever...you arguments are no better and no worse than his. Huh? I didn't make any arguments -either against gun ownership *or* carrying: I just pointed out that spouting fictitious reasons for constantly carrying a weapon works against the rights of responsible gun owners everywhere. ( If you want to preserve gun rights, then you *don't* want to convince the average voter that gun owners are all nuts. There are politicians from both sides of the aisle who would simply *love* to pounce on and exploit that idea. They've done it in the past, and will do it all over again given the least opening. ) In short; I'm strongly in favor of people being allowed to carry a weapon openly, and to own anything up to and including an anti-tank gun if they so desire; but convincing the general puiblic that all gun owners are irrational isn't how one goes about preserving gun rights. It has the reverse effect. > What part of that are you having trouble with? The part where *you* constantly share your advise with us all; loudly and at length -but claim to resent it when someone else does the same thing. What you actually seem to resent are positions that rub your grain the wrong way, but alas; Usenet has always been full of those and shows no signs of ever changing.
From: S'mee on 8 Jul 2010 14:44 On Jul 8, 12:21 pm, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: Typical cornell u limp dicked troll...not even an intelligent response.
From: Henry on 8 Jul 2010 14:45 Twitbull spewed spewed: > On Jul 8, 6:40 am, "S'mee" <stevenkei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> What part of that are you having trouble with? > The part where *you* constantly share your advise with us all; loudly > and at length -but claim to resent it when someone else does the same > thing. Time to run and hide behind your killfile and spew some idiotic lies about his mother, twit. That'll teach him! <g> -- "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: S'mee on 8 Jul 2010 15:52
On Jul 8, 12:23 pm, Twibil <nowayjo...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 8, 6:40 am, "S'mee" <stevenkei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Whatever...you arguments are no better and no worse than his. > > Huh? > > I didn't make any arguments -either against gun ownership *or* > carrying: I just pointed out that spouting fictitious reasons for > constantly carrying a weapon works against the rights of responsible > gun owners everywhere. ( If you want to preserve gun rights, then you > *don't* want to convince the average voter that gun owners are all > nuts. There are politicians from both sides of the aisle who would > simply *love* to pounce on and exploit that idea. They've done it in > the past, and will do it all over again given the least opening. ) > > In short; I'm strongly in favor of people being allowed to carry a > weapon openly, and to own anything up to and including an anti-tank > gun if they so desire; but convincing the general puiblic that all gun > owners are irrational isn't how one goes about preserving gun rights. > It has the reverse effect. > > > What part of that are you having trouble with? > > The part where *you* constantly share your advise with us all; loudly > and at length -but claim to resent it when someone else does the same > thing. > > What you actually seem to resent are positions that rub your grain the > wrong way, but alas; Usenet has always been full of those and shows no > signs of ever changing. what ever, obviously the fault is mine for not explaining where you went wrong. Sorry about that. |