From: DM on
AH#104 wrote:

> In a mild (get it), way I was saying <Bill> was dissin' the patrons.
>

Hey! There'll be no dissin' the Patron in here!

--
Fins BS#221 FD2 KOTC#8 EKIII rides with me
'05 FLHTCUI "Chief"
'02 FLSTCI
'38 UL "Ninong"
"If at first you don't succeed, find out if the loser gets anything."
From: the heekster on
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:26:53 GMT, Putt#19
<putt_remove(a)pullthisoutyahoo.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:49:09 -0500, the heekster <heekster(a)iwxt.net>
>wrote:
>
>>Regarding the frame, consider having it powdercoated. Black
>>powdercoat/clearpowdercoat gives a creamy sheen and depth similar to
>>that of real chrome. Except it is very, very black.
>>
>>Your local powdercoater may have samples. When I had my Pan frame
>>done, it was about $129. I also had to pay $30 to have the frame
>>media blasted, before it could be powdercoated.
>
>This is a restoration project for AMCA competition so powder coating
>is not an option. If this were to be an everyday rider I would have
>subbed out the frame for powder and I'd probably be delivering
>the finished product instead of mining the web and VBG for info.
>
Being a heathen when it comes to paint, looking at the finished
product, how does an AMCA judge, or anyone else, FTM, tell whether the
finish was sprayed, brushed, or dusted and baked on?

>The AMCA web site itself offered up a wealth of information in
>areas of assembly and parts identification as well as sources,
>but their paint related information was far less than I had hoped
>for even from their identified paint sources.
>
>Well, have a virtual drink on me and thanks for your kind input.
>
Good luck with the job. I take it you are healthier than the last
time I read you in here; something about a prohibition against pulling
up fenceposts by yaself.
--
the heekster, BS#4, preposterous
From: StT on
AH#104 wrote:

> Son, we live in a world that has usenet, and those groups have to be guarded
> by men with wit. Whose gonna do it? You? I have a greater responsibility
> than you could possibly fathom. You weep for those who are not here, and you
> curse the regulars who have outted them. You have that luxury. You have the
> luxury of not knowing what I know. That newbie's deaths, while tragic,
> probably saved usenet. And my existence, while grotesque and
> incomprehensible to you, saves RMH. You don't want the truth because deep
> down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that post,
> you need me on that post. We use words like beer, IRL, virtual. We use these
> words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a
> punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to
> a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very comfort that I
> provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather
> you just said thank you, and went on your way, Otherwise, I suggest you pick
> up a roto-plook, and stand a post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you
> think you are entitled to.

Whoa!

I love deNiro.
--
StT
stunned on a Saturday...
From: Tinman on
"StT" wrote:
>
> Whoa!
>
> I love deNiro.

What about Nicholson?


--
Mike



From: Tud on

"StT" <StT(a)urflink.net> wrote in message
news:oh7Uh.212$Ut6.50(a)newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> AH#104 wrote:
>
>> Son, we live in a world that has usenet, and those groups have to be
>> guarded by men with wit. Whose gonna do it? You? I have a greater
>> responsibility than you could possibly fathom. You weep for those who are
>> not here, and you curse the regulars who have outted them. You have that
>> luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know. That newbie's
>> deaths, while tragic, probably saved usenet. And my existence, while
>> grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves RMH. You don't want the
>> truth because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you
>> want me on that post, you need me on that post. We use words like beer,
>> IRL, virtual. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent
>> defending something. You use them as a punchline. I have neither the time
>> nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under
>> the blanket of the very comfort that I provide, and then questions the
>> manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said thank you, and
>> went on your way, Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a roto-plook, and
>> stand a post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you are
>> entitled to.
>
> Whoa!
>
> I love deNiro.

Me too. Nicholson is pretty good too, especailly in A Few Good Men. <sfsf>

--
Tud
SENS BS#111 LFS#32 FLF MISFIT Vermort AH#115
http://ah115.com
Sisyphus rides a Triumph


First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: Question about plugs.
Next: The Hells Angels a Cult?