From: Bob Myers on
On 4/22/2010 12:20 PM, ? wrote:
>
> Lot's of Americans of English/Scottish/Irish/Welsh descent are proud
> to obey the law and always drive on the right side of the road even
> when it's easier to cut corners. We always stop at four way stop signs
> in the middle of the agricultural grid and we look in all directions
> before proceeding, because obedience to the law was ingrained in our
> ancestors' psyches for 1000 years.
>
> Americans of German/Swiss/Scandinavian descent are even more likely to
> obey laws because of their own ancestors' experience in Europe.
> They're very private and inhibited people.
>

Let me make sure I have this right - now you're claiming that the
experience of one's ancestors is communicated genetically?

Pardon me, I think I need a few hours to get over this laughing fit...

Bob M.

From: ? on
On Apr 22, 2:06 pm, Bob Myers <nospample...(a)address.invalid> wrote:
> On 4/22/2010 12:20 PM, ? wrote:
> > Lot's of Americans of English/Scottish/Irish/Welsh descent are proud
> > to obey the law
>
> > Americans of German/Swiss/Scandinavian descent are even more likely to
> > obey laws

> Let me make sure I have this right - now you're claiming that the
> experience of one's ancestors is communicated genetically?

Nope. You just made that up. Culture is obviously communicated from
parents and elders and persons in positions of authority to children
and those in need of correction.

> Pardon me, I think I need a few hours to get over this laughing fit...

If you never came back, you wouldn't be missed...


From: Bob Myers on
On 4/22/2010 4:00 PM, ? wrote:
> On Apr 22, 2:06 pm, Bob Myers<nospample...(a)address.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 4/22/2010 12:20 PM, ? wrote:
>>
>>> Lot's of Americans of English/Scottish/Irish/Welsh descent are proud
>>> to obey the law
>>>
>>
>>> Americans of German/Swiss/Scandinavian descent are even more likely to
>>> obey laws
>>>
>
>> Let me make sure I have this right - now you're claiming that the
>> experience of one's ancestors is communicated genetically?
>>
> Nope. You just made that up. Culture is obviously communicated from
> parents and elders and persons in positions of authority to children
> and those in need of correction.
>

And so, as you back-pedal away from your obviously nonsensical
original statements, you are now assuming that (a) children of a given
ethnicity are only influenced by "elders and persons in positions of
authority" of that same ethnicity, and/or (b) that such "elders and
persons of authority" only influence children of the same ethnicity
as themselves.

Pardon me...another one of those laughing fits coming on...

So according to you, "culture" is something ONLY communicated
between persons of the same ethnic heritage and race? And hence
that a person's ethnicity is still far, far more important than the overall
culture in which they are raised?

And here I thought it was simply not possible that a person could be
so dense as to flunk Sociology 101, but you have again proven that
sort of assumption incorrect.

Bob M.

From: matt on
On Apr 22, 6:28 pm, Twibil <nowayjo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 22, 4:23 pm, climber <coledenk...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Soc.101 is a course for nitwits, ed majors, etc.
>
> Idiot, it's the required basic course for anyone who's going to be
> taking more sociology courses later on.
>
> Of course someone who dropped -or was thrown- out of junior high
> school wouldn't know about required courses.

Soc. 101 is a gateway for 'tards majoring in the social sciences.

MATT
From: Tim Crowley on
On Apr 22, 11:53 am, "f. barnes" <fre...(a)centurytel.net> wrote:
>

>
> I think

No you don't. You parrot the racist tripe your masters tell you to
spew. You're a racist, you don't even know how to think,