From: f. barnes on
On Apr 23, 7:50 am, Tim Crowley <timmyturm...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 22, 11:53 am, "f. barnes" <fre...(a)centurytel.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I think
>
> No you don't.  You parrot the racist tripe your masters tell you to
> spew.  You're a racist, you don't even know how to think,

"racist" ---- boriiiing! It's so last year.
From: Bob Myers on
On 4/22/2010 6:12 PM, Rob Kleinschmidt wrote:
>
> You're suggesting that English, Scots, Irish, Welsh, Saxons
> and Vikings didn't always live peacefully and harmoniously
> next door to each other, each one always respecting the
> others laws, rights and property ?
>
> Say it ain't so, Bob.
>

Why, quite clearly all of those "white people of good character" spent
all their time sitting around the campfire, giving each other nothing but
mutually supportive affirmations (and the occasional backrub), and
living in peace and harmony with the Disneyesque creatures who
inhabited their woodland paradise of a homeland.

EVERYTHING bad came from those "other" people, don'tcha know?


Bob M.
From: Bob Myers on
On 4/22/2010 5:23 PM, climber wrote:
> Soc.101 is a course for nitwits, ed majors, etc.
>

So I hear; didn't take it, myself. How was it?

Bob M.

From: Bob Myers on
On 4/22/2010 8:06 PM, ? wrote:
> On Apr 22, 6:25 pm, Twibil<nowayjo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> But if you're wise (oh silly thought) you won't call for a vote on how
>> people feel about *your* presence.
>>
> For your information:
>
> The universe is *not* a democracy. You cannot vote me out of
> existence.
>

As is clear from your continued presence. If you existence were subject
to a vote, you'd have vanished in a malodorous cloud of greasy smoke
years ago.

But Pete makes a good point: you're very fond of making statements about
how various people "wouldn't be missed" - but WOULD you want to put that
little claim to the test, vs. the degree of regret your own sudden existence
failure would cause?

Bob M.

From: Bob Myers on
On 4/23/2010 6:07 AM, matt wrote:
> On Apr 22, 6:28 pm, Twibil<nowayjo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Apr 22, 4:23 pm, climber<coledenk...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Soc.101 is a course for nitwits, ed majors, etc.
>>>
>> Idiot, it's the required basic course for anyone who's going to be
>> taking more sociology courses later on.
>>
>> Of course someone who dropped -or was thrown- out of junior high
>> school wouldn't know about required courses.
>>
> Soc. 101 is a gateway for 'tards majoring in the social sciences.
>

Again - how was it?

Bob M.